0
The Nuremberg Trials held Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes agenst humanity in violation of the rules of war true or false?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The first Nuremberg trial were only for the European war criminals (Class-A). Subsequent Nuremberg trials were held for lesser criminals. Other European countries also held separate trials for lesser war criminals (Class B & C).
The International Military Tribunal for the Far Ear were for major Japanese war criminals (Class-A). Other countries held separate trials for lesser (Class-B and C) war criminals.
Also after WWI Germany agreed to hold war crimes trials but since the allies did not occupy the German/Austrian nations, the trials were not generally successful, thought the court did its best.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
False. The Nuremberg Trials specifically focused on prosecuting German war criminals after World War II, while the Tokyo Trials were held to address the actions of Japanese war criminals. Both trials sought to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity and violations of the rules of war.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the Nuremberg trials hold Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes against humanity in violation of the rules of war?
No, the Nuremberg trials were specifically for prosecuting German war criminals. Japanese war criminals were tried separately in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, also known as the Tokyo trials, which held Japanese individuals accountable for their actions during World War II.
The relocation of US Citizens of Japanese descent during world war ll was a violation of which constitutional principal?
The relocation of US Citizens of Japanese descent during World War II was a violation of the constitutional principle of due process as outlined in the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
What supreme court case put Japanese in internment camps?
The Supreme Court case that upheld the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II was Korematsu v. United States (1944). The Court ruled that the internment was justified due to military necessity, a decision that has been widely criticized as a violation of civil liberties.
What is true of Japanese internment?
During World War II, the United States government forcibly relocated around 120,000 Japanese Americans to internment camps, citing national security concerns. This action has since been widely criticized as a violation of civil liberties and as a result, the U.S. government issued a formal apology and reparations to survivors in 1988.
How did the Japanese American Citizen league fight for Japanese American civil rights?
The Japanese American Citizens League (JACL) fought for Japanese American civil rights through initiatives such as advocating for redress and reparations for those interned during World War II, promoting education about Japanese American history and culture, and speaking out against discrimination and prejudice. The JACL also worked to increase political representation and civic engagement among Japanese Americans to ensure their rights were protected.
Did the Nuremberg trials hold Japanese war criminals accountable for crimes against humanity in violation of the rules of war?
No, the Nuremberg trials were specifically for prosecuting German war criminals. Japanese war criminals were tried separately in the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, also known as the Tokyo trials, which held Japanese individuals accountable for their actions during World War II.
Why were the Nuremberg trials held at the end of World War 2?
Nuremberg was the unofficial capital of Nazi Germany. It was regarded as the most German of all cities and because of this, it was Hitler's favorite city. Nuremberg was where the Nazis held their famous rallies. The city was bombed by America in January 1945 because of its importance to Hitler and the Nazis, and 90% of the historic part of the city was destroyed. Because of its association with the Nazis, Nuremberg was chosen as the site of the war crimes trials after the war. Previously, Nuremberg had been the unofficial capital of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation for 500 years.
Who was the principal Hangman of the Japanese war criminals?
lieutenant Rexrod
Can you call the Japanese criminals?
you can't call a race of people, criminals, or else you would have to call all races criminals. only the victors get to write history. is he a partisan or a terrorist, depends which side your on
When were the Japanese war criminals hanged?
December 23, 1948, Sugamo Prison.
Who was the executioner for Japanese war criminals?
Some photographs show US Army personnel at the gallows.
What was the controversy surrounding the yasukuni shrine concerns?
The shrine houses Japanese soldiers, which includes war criminals.
Who were prosecuted during World War 2?
Japanese and Nazi war criminals for "Crimes Against Humanity" .
Who was the Indian judge who ruled the Japanese emperor not guilty during the trial of war criminals?
Justice radhabinod pal
Who was the Indian judge who ruled the Japanese emperor not guilty during the trial of war of criminals?
Justice radhabinod pal
Where were the Axis Japanese World War 2 war criminals tried for war crimes which city and nation?
Tokyo
When were Japanese Americans isolated in camps?
During World War II & the war with Japan, many Japanese-Americans were put into Internment Camps. This was a huge human rights violation. Once the war was over, the president of the United States of America publicly apologized for this violation.
