Sumit vashishtha
There is no definite answer to this question. A religious person would tell you without a doubt that yes there is. A devout athiest would tell you that there is not a heaven. Both would be wrong, you see if there is indeed a heaven then you have to die to go there (pretty convenient way of keeping people from trying to prove/disprove this theory). But for someone to say that they know for a fact that there is no heaven would be ignorant because just as religion has not been able to prove there is a heaven, science has not been able to prove that there is not.
how can you prove that earth is a sphere by looking at the pole st
Because we know the moon is real, we have the technology to get there, god on the other hand is not real and there is no way to prove that he is real, it's like trying to prove the tooth fairy is real
Astronomers are unable to prove the existence of dark matter & dark energy.In fact astronomers have not yet proved most astronomical effects. Worm holes, black holes, or even the big bang. But proof in theories is almost impossible. The longer a theory stays intact is a sign of it's "proof" but some "sane" theories have been proven to be incorrect - "Einsteins biggest blunder".No scientist will say they have proved anything "astronomical" as it is almost impossible to prove anything without physical interaction.It's a bit like saying "I can prove that dogs live in the next street" based on only hearing their barks and not actually going there.
Heliocentrism.
== == Religion is all about faith, whilst science is a branch of overall knowledge for mankind. Religion is about belief whilst science emphasises more on knowledge-seeking. However religion is something that cannot be proven - right or wrong and true of false. Religion & Science at times may not be compatible or can run parallel to one another. Just as science cannot prove religion, it goes without saying religion cannot empirically prove anything on science. However, for believers science is part of religion, and NOT vice versa. ---- Thus, there is no way to prove the truth of any religion scientifically. All religions are equally based on faith alone, and which one you choose to follow, if you choose to follow a religion at all, is simply a matter of faith. Religion is the source of all knowledge of the world. Religion is for our spiritual ascension while science is for our physical ascension in this world. Both the disciplines are necessary for the successful physical as well as eternal life. Both are distinct in themselves and hence cannot be compared at any instance. Science cannot reach the spiritual zenith of religion and Religion cannot bow down to the levels to justify the theories of Science. "RELIGION BEGINS WHERE OUR INTELLECT ENDS". The things for which we could reason out automatically becomes 'science' for us. And the things which are beyond the reach of our intellect and power of reasoning automatically becomes 'religion' for us. Science is the vast ground and Religion is the unending sky. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Religion and science, at least in the absolute sense(where it is assumed that having religious believes is a form of non-education) are incompatible. Religion offers certainty where none exists, science finds new ways to prove itself wrong.
Do a science degree to prove your standards to get into the coarse.
Science can not be used to prove or disprove any religious faith. Science is based on factual observations and deductions drawn from these observations, the veracity of which are testable by experiment: Religion is a leap of faith. Any religion that says or implies that it is scientifically proved is lying to you and as such not worthy of your faith/belief.
I know for one thing, that science can't prove anything. That is essentially one major thing that makes up science today, and has for centuries. But really, If science can't prove anything, Did science just prove that science can't prove anything? Because if it did, then you can prove that science is wrong, because you just proved something!
Science, art, and religion all seek to explain the world and human experience, but they use different approaches and methodologies. Science relies on empirical evidence and reason, art explores emotions and creativity, while religion deals with the spiritual and transcendent aspects of life. They can complement each other in providing a holistic understanding of the world.
no
If a man is totally blind you can never prove to him that there is a light, and if has any sight at all, there is no need to prove it because he will see it himself. We don't prove the light but the light proves us whether we're blind or not. Jesus Christ was and still is the light of the world, and if you can't see that light, that's the proof that you are blind.
Science uses facts as the basis for making sense of the world. Religion uses 'faith' to give meaning to our presence in the world. However, if faith (religion) is used to explain facts then it will fail because science works better at explaining the physical world. From what we understand at the moment science can not prove or disprove the existence of God and thus there is room for 'faith' (religion) in the world. The important thing to remember about Science is that a scientific explanation of the observed facts is not a 'truth' it is JUST an explanation that stands until a better one is found. Science requires that you continually test theories.
Have you tried opening your eyes? That might prove beneficial to your vision. AND PERHAPS YOUR BLIND
It is impossible to "prove" that any religion is the right religion. What is "right" for one person might not be for another person. Religion is a matter of the heart's connection with God and there are many paths.
it is a question that science cannot prove such as, "are vampires real", because science cannot prove that supernatural things exist