Want this question answered?
there was no benifits to the building of the railroad. they built it for no reason and they never used it. 400 billion dollars down the drain. dion nalls.. yeahhh
1. There never was any "imperialism" on the part of the Chinese. 2. They came to America (the first large immigrations) to mine for gold, during California's Gold Rush of 1849. 3. Being available for mass labor, they helped build America's first transcontinental railroad which hooked up with the mostly Irish built portion of the railroad at Promontory Point in Utah in 1869. 4. Being available for more hard work, and with the gold fields used up, and the railroads built...the Chinese built the levy system in California's Sacramento Valley.
It is safe to say that America would be different; but exactly how different, we cannot know.
he never got to america,he thought that he was in america but in a different place
No, he never actually went to retrieve slaves and lead them to the North. However, he did provide money, shoes, and a place for them to stay. He coordinated much of the railroad as well.
stop
There was never an actual underground railroad. The underground railroad refers to the process used to free slaves during slavery.
he never got to america,he thought that he was in america but in a different place
it was never put into construction therefore was never built.
The "iron horse" was the name given to the steam locomotive as the Trans-Continental Railroad was built. It was how the native populations of the areas the railroad was built through could understand and describe a locomotive, which was a technology they had never before seen. The locomotive was described as being "like a horse" because it pulls "wagons" (railroad cars) and travels long distances; it was distinguished from a living horse by being made of iron and only running along the steel rails laid down by workers.
the cleopata was never built
it was never built