You just say whatever fits the case>
He had offended a French nobleman- and was imprisoned in the Bastille without trial or opportunity to defend himself. Fearing an indefinite length of term, he suggested exile to England and the French authorities accepted.
bad
A preliminary hearing might better balance the rights of society and the rights of the accused. With a preliminary hearing a judge is going to weigh the evidence and decide if there is enough evidence for trial. With a grand jury, a group of citizens decides if there is enough evidence for trial.
yes it was because his life was in jeopardy
because Hitler shot himself or was shot it is desputable before he could be captured and himmler was captured by the british but killed himself when he swallowed cyenide in prison before he could go on trial.
You defend a trial argument bygetting a laywergetting a entorneyor not arguing at all
At her trial she blamed everything she and Dr Browning did on Riley, as Riley was dead and could not defend himself.
To defend the defendent
Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.
A body of evidence would include all of the evidence of a particular trial. It may be physical evidence or it may be circumstantial evidence or a combination of both.
Chaerephon was a friend of Socrates who asked the Oracle of Delphi if anyone was wiser than Socrates. The Oracle replied that no one was wiser than Socrates, leading Socrates to dedicate his life to understanding this paradox.
The cast of Tak zhit nelzya - 1990 includes: Francis Biddle as Himself - US Judge at Nuremberg Olya Dvoretskaya as Herself - Senior Police Lieutenant Wilhelm Frick as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Hans Fritzsche as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Walther Funk as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Stanislav Govorukhin as Commentator Rudolf Hess as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Alfred Jodl as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Ernst Kaltenbrunner as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Wilhelm Keitel as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Geoffrey Lawrence as Himself - British Judge at Nuremberg Aleksandr Nevzorov as Himself - Journalist Erich Raeder as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Alfred Rosenberg as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Roman Rudenko as Himself - Soviet Prosecutor at Nuremberg Fritz Sauckel as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Hjalmar Schacht as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Maximilian Schell as German Commentator Albert Speer as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Julius Streicher as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Konstantin von Neurath as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Franz von Papen as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Joachim von Ribbentrop as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Baldur von Schirach as Himself - Nuremberg Trial
they would defend themselves by using solid evidence they have collected throughout there investigation. Evidence must be creditable to accept in the court of law. Crime scene investigators in order to maintain reliability must be certain and take every step of collecting evidence seriously. In this factor, experts also used to defend evidence findings from a crime scene. As long as the proper steps taken to collect the evidence to be able to test it then the crime scene investigator has done his or her job. The steps that would fir protocol are chain of custody is the evidence discovered the chain of custody starts. This would include who discovered and collected the evidence where it discovered and how it collected with the time and date. You have the photographs evidence for the location of the crime scene. Where the evidence located on the crime scene and objects that may be of use as evidence. There is the collection of the evidence, which as long as the guidelines followed to the last letter and times and dates put on the package without contamination then the evidence presented in court. The evidence put in a controlled environment until trial. There is the expert witness testimony, which used to defend the evidence creditability and how it relates to the trial. The expert witness can explain the findings of the evidence to show it is link to the defendant in the case.
It is a piece of physical evidence presented at trial.
Exculpatory evidence at trial is evidence which helps to prove the innocence of the person on trial. The opposite word is inculpatory, evidence which proves his guilt.
Relevant evidence is ANY evidence which will tend to prove either the guilt (or innocence) of the defendant on trial. Therefore, anything that is not NOT relevant is NOT EVIDENCE and will not be admitted.
A "Mapp" hearing is a pre-trial hearing on whether or not to suppress a piece of evidence that is going to be introduced at trial. The evidence could be tangible evidence, such as an illegal substance, or intangible evidence, such as a confession.