0
representation takes place, opens a different prospect, and promises the cure for which we are seeking. Let us examine the points in which it varies from pure democracy, and we shall comprehend both the nature of the cure and the efficacy which it must derive from the Union. public voice, pronounced by the representatives of the people, will be more consonant to the public good than if pronounced by the people themselves, convened for the purpose the representatives must be raised to a certain number, in order to guard against the cabals of a few; and that, however large it may be, they must be limited to a certain number, in order to guard against the confusion of a multitude. Hence, the number of representatives in the two cases not being in proportion to that of the two constituents, and being proportionally greater in the small republic, it follows that, if the proportion of fit characters be not less in the large than in the small republic, the former will present a greater option, and consequently a greater probability of a fit choice. as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters. By enlarging too much the number of electors, you render the representatives too little acquainted with all their local circumstances and lesser interests; as by reducing it too much, you render him unduly attached to these, and too little fit to comprehend and pursue great and national objects
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What situations would a representative democracy work better than a direct democracy?
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
What situations would a representative democracy work better than direct democracy?
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
What the opposite of representative?
The opposite of representative (typical) would be uncharacteristic, or different.(The opposite of representative democracy is direct democracy.)(The opposite status from a representative is the constituent, or person represented.)
In what situations would a representative work better than a direct democracy?
In a direct democracy, anyone can participate in the government. But in a representative democracy, you must be elected.
What is the opposite of representative?
The opposite of representative (typical) would be uncharacteristic, or different.(The opposite of representative democracy is direct democracy.)(The opposite status from a representative is the constituent, or person represented.)
What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?
In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, citizens participate directly in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies themselves. Representative democracies often have a system of elected officials who represent the people's interests, compared to direct democracies where citizens have a more immediate role in governance.
What is the name of government that elects a representative to govern?
That would be a "Democracy".
What doese Representative democracy mean?
A democracy is a democracy where the whole population votes onan issue (such as a new law trying to be passed) and in a represenative democracy there is a representative that has been elected by the people that votes on an issue. An example of a representative democracy would be the united states because the people of the U.S. vote on a representative for the senate and the house of representatives to vote on law that are trying to be passes.
Why does Madison reject pure democracy in favor of representative democracy?
Madison believed that pure democracy could lead to tyranny of the majority, where the majority could easily oppress the rights of the minority. Representative democracy, on the other hand, allows for the selection of individuals to represent the interests of the people while providing checks and balances to prevent such tyranny.
Why did the American colonists switch from a direct democracy to a representative democracy?
So their government would be controled better.
What government would the maximum amount of personal freedom would be found?
representative democracy
What is a good sentence for democracies?
a direct democracy would be near impossible in a country with as many citizens as the U.S., which is why we are governed by a representative democracy.
