Want this question answered?
That would affect the food cycle, less production.
The white tiger would normally control the population of its prey, but facing extinction, the tigers prey will flourish and overpopulate. (: Hope that helps.
there would be no more red pandas
Because then it would damage the circle of life!
No, as the groundhog is not present in all the world. Mainly the USA.
For the most part, the extinction of the species would not really impact the world to much degree, besides the small disruption it would entail on the local ecosystem
the extinction of pandas would affect us byother animals would not be able to eat themwe would have a lot of bamboo that we do not needwe would have a big forest that they left
The tiger says so because the tiger is on the verge of extinction. He is about to get extinct from the planet earth. If the tiger would get extinct, the entire ecosystem would be imbalanced. The forest will die, and eventually the earth would have nothing.
Almost certainly. Anytime you remove an apex predator from the environment, the entire food chain suffers. But happily, neither species are in any danger of extinction now. The world population of black bears is over 900,000, that of the brown bear over 300,000. Source; World Wildlife Fund
The way it would affect the ecological balance is whatever eats the red wolf would die and whatever ate that would die and it goes on and on and on
Yes. The extinction of the Tasmanian Tiger (more correctly known as the Thylacine) essentially resulted after a bounty was put on it, for fear it would kill stock animals. However, the reasons for its extinction on the mainland are unknown. It has long been thought that the arrival of dingoes caused its extinction, as they proved to be too effective competitors for food. Scientists have their doubts about this theory, with many surmising that the natural events of global warming and drought caused the thylacine's extinction on the mainland.
the end of the world as we kno it