Want this question answered?
Usually you would pour liquid or manirals one at a time down the sink or most of all the Tolit if you mix you minerals it will cubism explutin
Only in nuclear physics and nuclear chemistry laboratories.
Only in nuclear chemistry and nuclear physics laboratories.
Non-hazardous waste would generally include: glass, wood, paper common metals such as iron or steel, most plastics (some can leach harmful substances into the environment), brick and other hardcore substances, approved water-based products and anything not listed as hazardous in the latest regulations. Recycling would be regarded as the most appropriate method of disposing of the waste.
This part is the core of the nuclear reactor containing the nuclear fuel.
no, its not safe to dispose nuclear waste in water,rather it would be safe to dispose it in common salt trenches.
Mecause melting does not destroy the radioactivity. Whatever burns would cause radioactive ash/smoke that would be carried away on the wind. the rest would just turn a patch of the lava radioactive.
No, lasers would not cause nuclear changes, they would only melt or vaporise material which is not what is wanted. The nuclear properties of the waste would remain the same.
Women on the goldfields typically disposed of waste by burying it in pits or throwing it into nearby creeks or rivers. They did not have access to modern waste disposal facilities, so they had to find ways to manage their waste in the absence of formal infrastructure.
NIMBY
It depends where you live. Many countries have a refuse collection service.
It is produced by the product of a nuclear plant by the uranium turning waste/gunk radioactive and the gunk flowing through waste pipes and having a black tint -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually Uranium gets split into Barium and Krypton along with release of immense heat energy. These by products are highly radioactive. These would emit harmful gamma radiations. These are considered as nuclear waste. Some innovative techniques have to be found so as to recycle these without any harm. Definitely human brain would catch that soon.
Possibly, but the Antarctic Treaty expressly prohibits **anything nuclear** south of 60 degrees S, which includes Antarctica. It would also be shortsighted to pollute a pristine continent rather than dealing with our own waste products.
It depends on the waste material. Methods appropriate for chemical hazards would not be so for nuclear waste.
It would cause pollution because it would harm men or animals using the land, and would contaminate food produced on the land. However this is not allowed to happen, nuclear waste is carefully controlled and confined to waste stores designed for the purpose
Nothing bad will happen. Marijuana does not leak any harmful nuclear waste, such as methamphetamine, so you'll simply get the same high you would if you smoked the weed. c:
it means that either a nuclear rocket or a nuclear lab has exploded letting out nuclear waste and radiation which means the city would have to be evacuated until they are out of the nuclear radation zone.