The Washington Monument is a fine example of an obelisk.
Just look at that obelisk!
That's the third obelisk we've uncovered this week! Pardon me, sir, your obelisk is double-parked.
The Washington Monument in Washington, DC is designed to resemble an Egyptian obelisk.
It's like asking, "what would you like to cave on your obelisk"? There is no requirement that anything be carved on the side on an obelisk, and it would be up to the whoever made the obelisk or commissioned it as to what, if anything, would be carved on any side of it.
JUMP-EN037 - Obelisk the Tormentor (Effect Monster). It is not banned or limited.
How would you use theory in a sentence
It depends. Slifer the Sky Dragon has the potential to be WAY better then than Obelisk, but if you have a low amount of cards in your hand, it can be quite weak. I would use Obelisk, because the attack and defence of that card won't change, Slifer's will.
Yes. Obelisk the Tormentor does not restrict a player from using Spell or Trap Cards.
if you sacrifice ra and slifer while obelisk is on the field obelisk wood have infinite attack and nothing can stop him
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.