A company that accuses an employee of stealing, cheating on books, etc., has got to have proof! If any machinery, tools, etc., have been stolen from the company (any files, etc.) unless they have that person on tape the company doesn't have a case! They can't make a false statement and if you are not guilty I suggest you see a lawyer and sue the company. If you don't this will show on your record for further employment and ruin your future. If you are guilty then bite the bullet! In general in the US you have to be charged with theft and convicted, or admit guilt, in order to be fired. For less serious charges, like cheating on the mileage on your expense report, if they can document it you'll be fired for lying. It is highly unlikely that any company execs. would accuse an employee of wrong doing if they did not have sufficient evidence to support the claim. They are however, not required to submit the evidence to the accused unless or until it becomes a matter of the court. The "proof" would obviously depend upon what type of position the accused held, such as working in accounting/bookeeping, sale of goods or services, and so forth. If the person is fired and they believe it to be unjustified it is their responsibility to obtain legal advice or representation or to handle the disputed firing "pro se". An employer can fire you for any reason - good, bad or unproven - that does not violate a statute or a contract. An employer need not ever "prove" or explain a decision or discipline to an employee (if you are unionized, the employer explains to the union). Proof is a word for the courtroom, where there are standards of proof. Employers who want to have employees' trust should gather "relevant and credible evidence" before disciplines.
What is the point of making him feel guilty? You should either decide to accept it or decide to change your situation. You can't cause him to feel anything he doesn't wish to feel.
If you did not cheat then tell her to show you the proof. There cannot be any proof if you are telling the truth.
Most boys once they are guilty they don't say anything
be as honest and sensitive as possible and make sure that you have proof that the person was cheating
suspect
In a court of law, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to demonstrate the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
You either believe him or you dont, if you have proof dont.
get proof first...then just break it to her straight up
Pictures. Always. Or record a conversation regarding it. Written proof is always good.
you show her who is in charge and put her in her place
Unless you have proof you are not guilty the judge will still find you guilty. Why not just take responsibility for your actions if you are guilty.
They initially voted guilty because they believed with all of the evidence, that juror #8 was incorrect and that there was too much proof for the19 year old boy to be not guilty.