If no warning signs are posted, then you may be able to hold the animal's owner at fault or partially at fault, depending on your states regulations regarding farm animals and depending on how and why the animal was loose. You could only hold the owner at fault if you can determine that the accident was the result of the owners negligence or failure to exercisereasonable care and control to keep the animal secured.
If the Farmer was the victim of property damage resulting in the animals escape and this was unknown to him or by a reason beyond his control, such as an act of nature or vandalism, then he is not at fault and should not be held liable. This is much the same situation as if your car was stolen and the thief took your vehicle to rob a bank and hit 3 people in the getaway. We would not hold the owner of the stolen vehicle at fault for the robbery nor for the reckless driving of the bank robber.
This type of a loss could sometimes be determined to be mutual fault. Fault in this case again would hinge on "reasonable care and control", This applies to both the animal owner and the driver of the vehicle that hit the animal. You can't hold the owner of the animal liable simply because he is the owner.
As an Example, If a neighbors child runs out into the street and you hit the child, without an establishment of negligence, you can not hold the parent at fault for damages to your bumper, simply because they are the parent of the child.
Although it is a good Idea for Farmers and Ranchers to insure against this type of loss, There is no requirement of law that the property owner have any specific limits of coverage nor that he have any insurance coverage at all. It is the property owners choice to buy insurance or not. Their may sometimes be contractual obligations to carry property or liability insurance when a finance note is involved. It is also the property owners choice as to the limits and scope of any coverage he desires.
From a Texas General Agent.
_______________________________________________________Responsibility of Hitting a Farm Animal on a Public Road
I'll agree with the crossing signes being posted & that the operator of the motor vehicle to be in control of their vehicle at all times... Also here in my area one of the rule sin farming is: that we Farmers are to keep our fences up & livestock in so that damages like this does not happen. I myself have always thought hat if a horse, coe or other gets out & causes damage to others property, it is we the Farmers fault. Maybe laws are different in other states. M.C.S.
Here are opinions from various Wiki s Contributors:
Generally speaking, if the area is closed range, which a vast majority of the country is, it is the responsibility of the farmer to keep his animals. If it is open range, all bets are off, and the driver is on notice that farm animals could be 'ranging' anywhere, and the responsibility transfers to the driver, even to the point of having to pay for the injured or killed animal.
Yes, the driver is responsible for making sure the vehicle they are driving is safe to be driven on public roads. In Oregon, a driver could be charged with criminally negligent homicide If someone dies because of a collision caused by mechanical failure on their vehicle.
To legally operate a vehicle on public roads
If the ATV travels on any public road/highway, then yes, the driver and the vehicle must be licensed ... and insured.
No driver is allowed to operate a vehicle on public roads in the U.S. without Financial Responsibility regardless of license status.
No, but if you wish to actually drive a vehicle, you will need to have insurance on that vehicle. A driver must also have a valid driver's license. Anyone who wishes to drive a car on a public street needs to have that vehicle registered and licensed as well as having liability insurance on that vehicle.
Any Driver operating a motor vehicle on public roads is required to carry Financial Responsibility.
It is illegal to abandon a vehicle on a public motorway, as it is a serious threat to the safety of drivers. Abandoning your vehicle on someone else's property will probably result in the vehicle being ticketed and towed, and the owner/driver being fined. If the vehicle is abandoned in a secure location and/or looks suspicious, it will be seized by police to be searched, and the driver may be detained. You may only abandon your vehicle on your own property.
Yes you do need a cdl for a job as a UPS driver. A CDL license is a commercial drivers license and since a UPS driver drives a commercial vehicle on public roads the driver does need this specialized license.
No. You cannot operate a vehicle on any public roadways or public property without a valid operator license or permit. Period.
Yes. The lender is legally required to sell the vehicle at public auction for as close to the fair market value as is possible. The proceeds of the sale of the vehicle is applied to the loan balance and the borrower is responsible for any deficiency and possibly additional fees.
The owner of the car. If YOU got a ticket because YOU were operating an uninsured vehicle on a public road, YOU are responsible for the ticket. There may also be a citation for the owner for having the vehicle registered without the required insurance.
The debt is not cancelled simply because the vehicle was repossessed. The borrower is still responsible for the existing amount of the loan (if any) after the vehicle has been sold at public auction.