Typically the person who hit you would be liable, but the situation and context may mitigate this.
If YOU are the driver of the vehicle that started the chain collision, and pushed the car you hit into the car in front ot it. - YOU are responsible.
There were two tornadoes in the state of Washington in 2011.
The driver has the sole responsibility as they were behind the wheel.
It varies from state to state. In California the renter is responsible for any and all damages regardless of fault. It's up to the renter to go after the person that caused the damage.
Hard to say. Possibly equal fault by both parties but most likely the person backing out.
Yes, when I was 6 a big typhoon with 65-85 mph winds hit all of Washington around 1993.
Typically the person who hit you pays. If they don't have insurance, your no fault insurance will pay for it.
you need to file a claim against their insurance company- anyone who hits you from behind was not alert enough to stop in time- unless this is a fraud most people who are hit from behind should not be at fault
The State isn't responsible for keeping track of the deer. And the driver should have been driving more carefully.
Yes they can sorry if that scares you but a hurricane can form anywhere if under the right circumstances.
Are you saying that you are uninsured, and the drunk was at fault, if simply due to the fact that you were uninsured (and of no fault whatsoever), you have to pay for his vehicle? NO, the ''at fault/negligent" party is liable/responsible for the damages they caused due to their neglience. Subject to any laws in your state barring uninsured drivers/owners from recovery of damage. But just because you are uninsured (if not at fault) you are not responsible for the drunks damages.
The car that hit you from behind.