If the photograph is copyrighted then the copyright owner has the exclusive right to make derivative works, including drawings or paintings of any recognizable portion of the original photograph.
Copyright duration of works produced prior to 1977 is discussed under "Duration of copyrights".
If you are taking a clip from the movie, the movie itself is protected by copyright, but depending on your use, it may be covered by 17USC107. If you are using a photograph of it, the photograph would be protected by copyright, but your use may be covered by 17USC107.
He should be getting permission from the copyright holder of the photograph before colorizing it, and rights in the resulting colorized image should be addressed in that agreement.
Definitely possible to photograph it. But you cannot catch the image on a screen but virtual image can be seen by eyes. So photograph too is possible.
Definitely possible to photograph it. But you cannot catch the image on a screen but virtual image can be seen by eyes. So photograph too is possible.
You would need to be the rightsholder for the image (or license it), and the words would need to be reasonably short and property attributed.
Owning an image or the copyright to an image are the same thing. When you hold the copyright to an image it is yours to do with whatever you will, and you can decide who has permission to use it or not. There is no difference.
Areail photograph
Copyright is automatic, so it will be the date the image was created.
From google image
it is to enhance a photograph!!
If you wish to reuse a copyright-protected image, you need permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law.
This would be the opposite of a blurry or unfocused image.