The case won't be heard in Federal Court. The initial trial (if it ever gets that far) will be heard in the lowest level court of original jurisdiction - probably a state circuit court.
Obstructing a police officer is a serious offense. If the obstuction occurs as the officer is investigating, you could be charged with a felony in court. In other situations, it would likely be a misdemeaner.
No, if a police officer is killed, his cases are not automatically dropped in court. The court procedures would continue as normal, with replacement officers or other personnel taking over the cases. The prosecution would make necessary arrangements to ensure the cases are pursued and justice is sought.
Anytime you interact with the court system or adversely with a police officer it is good to have a lawyer present.
It would depend on the type of crime committed.
In court, the judge decides what questions may and may not be asked of a witness, including a police officer. The only way you could receive a ticket or be arrested for asking a question in court would be if you had been directed by the judge not to ask a certain question.
if you were a police officer would you have to get tazed before you get a tazor?
"I'm and police officer" would be "Olen ja poliisi/konstaapeli". "I'm a police officer" would be "Olen poliisi/konstaapeli".
It is very likely that the teacher would be arrested for assault on a police officer.
a police officer would use a database for identity of whose been in prison and who is in prison
If it is a felony conviction, I believe it would require a federal pardon to reinstate the officer's right to possess a handgun. I cannot envision a situation in which this would be justified.
You would call him/her the chief of police.
in which of the following situations would a police officer exercise the greatest amount of discretion?