No.
First, note that both the terms "subject" and "commoner" are archaic and no longer used. But even when they were current, the definitions are different.
"Subject" is a relative term: you have to be subject OF or TO something. Traditionally, everyone in England would be "subject" to the king or queen, but even he/she is also subject to the law (this is not often stated, but it's true - the English had a whole series of wars to prove it).
"Commoner" meant, simply, everyone who was not of noble rank. So nobles were not commoners, but they were subjects. The term "Commoner" would also apply to foreigners (other than nobles), who would not normally be classed as "subjects" to the king/queen.
Two or more subjects with the same verb is a compound subject.
All people in England are called subjects of the King or Queen.
king Henry 2's legal reforms
William Shakespeare was born in Warwickshire, England, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I of England so, yes, he was one of her subjects.
Two or more subjects with the same verb is a compound subject.
Inca nobles received education in specialized schools called "yachaywasi," where they were taught subjects like history, law, and religion by skilled tutors. Commoners, on the other hand, were educated within their communities by their families, learning practical skills like farming, weaving, and pottery making. Nobles also learned about leadership and warfare, while commoners focused on mastering trade and agricultural techniques.
The plebeians were the commoners. The patricians were the aristocracy.
The LITERAL meaning is that the subjects are all the same as they usually are.
All commoners had to pay the same amount of taxes to the king.
Subjects in Russia are the same as subjects anywhere else. If you are referring to something cultural you need to be more specific.
Commoners Crown was created in 1974-10.
The same subjects you would study anywhere else in the world....