Actually, the previous answer was not quite right:
A "void contract" is a contract that cannot be enforced because of some defect that occurred at or before the formation of the contract. For parties that have not followed the terms of the contract, establishing that the contract was "void" is a complete defense. It's like saying that the contract never existed.
A breach of contract, however, necessarily occurs after the formation of a valid contract, and it's not a defense, but a cause of action. A party who breached a contract owes the other party damages resulting from the breach.
Many contracts are also "voidable," which means that they are not inherently void and unenforceable, but that can become such at the disadvantaged party's option.
Here are just a few examples of void, voidable, and breached contracts:
I'm not an attorney, but the meanings of the words are clear enough. When a contract is void, it simply means that the contract has no affect. Neither party is required to honor it any longer. I rent an apartment and I purchase renter's insurance. In the middle of the contract period, I move. The original contract becomes void. I can't make a claim from my new apartment if the insurance company never knew I moved. Also, I can request pro-rated premium back, since when I moved, the contract was rendered void.
Now I sign a contract and I agree to do some painting for a guy. He gives me half payment, with full payment at the end of the job. I do a quarter of the job and skip town. That's a breach.
I have no idea I'm searching for the same thing!
Signing two contracts regarding the same matter is fraudulent behavior, at the very least, on the part of the person who signed them both. Breaching a contract is failing to live up to the terms stated in the contract and the punishment for breach is generally stated in the contract. Whether or not a breach of contract has occurred is uncertain without seeing the documents in question. Fraudulent behavior is a crime, however, and the punishment will be decided by the laws of your state.
The measure of damages in a claim for breach of contract is that sum that would place the Plaintiff (the aggrieved party) in the same position as he/she/it would have been had the contract been performed by the breaching party. This is most frequently meaured in terms of money, but under certain circumstances, the remedy for breach may be "specific performance"--in other words, getting the court to order the breaching party to actually do that which he/she/it promised to do.
no i dont. if i agreed with you does that mean we have a contract??
Yes they mean the same thing.
Yes they mean the same thing.
Yes, they mean the same thing.
Yes, they can mean the same thing.
No, they are not the same thing. Mean and average are the same thing.
Shabby and different do not mean the same thing.
These two words can mean the same thing.
It can mean the same thing if you use it right:It's a solid source.It's a dependable source.They SOMETIMES can mean the same thing.