I have no idea I'm searching for the same thing!
Nationality, or citizenship as in dual citizenship [double nationalite, or double citoyennete].
The social contract theory holds that in earliest history man lived in a "state of nature." No government existed. Each man was only as secure as his own power and mental awareness could make him. By agreeing with one another to make a state by contract, men within a given area joined together, each surrendering personal freedom as necessary to promote the safety and well being of all. By this contract the members created a government. The social contract gives rights and responsibilities to both the citizenry and the government. For example, in The United States, citizens yield the powers of prosecution of, and punishment for, criminal offenses to the judicial branch of government. The government, for its part, bears the responsibilities of maintaining public safety for the citizens through the police, court systems, correctional facilities, and all supporting structures. Answer The poster above provides an excellent summary. To read first hand about social contract theory, pick up Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes.A population in a place (territory) gave up power (as needed) to the government to promote the well-being of all. Doing so this created a sovereign state.
social reforms are done for the society
it mean wat happens next
social equality mean social that people live and have respect right the same right other and they have freedom, right for life .
social contract theory
A possible explanation of something in the past or present
John Locke suggested the idea of the social contract. The idea is that citizens of a country are willing to give up some of their personal freedom in order to receive the protection of the government.
Locke's use of the term original agreement is the same as the social contract.
Nationality, or citizenship as in dual citizenship [double nationalite, or double citoyennete].
The social contract theory holds that in earliest history man lived in a "state of nature." No government existed. Each man was only as secure as his own power and mental awareness could make him. By agreeing with one another to make a state by contract, men within a given area joined together, each surrendering personal freedom as necessary to promote the safety and well being of all. By this contract the members created a government. The social contract gives rights and responsibilities to both the citizenry and the government. For example, in The United States, citizens yield the powers of prosecution of, and punishment for, criminal offenses to the judicial branch of government. The government, for its part, bears the responsibilities of maintaining public safety for the citizens through the police, court systems, correctional facilities, and all supporting structures. Answer The poster above provides an excellent summary. To read first hand about social contract theory, pick up Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes.A population in a place (territory) gave up power (as needed) to the government to promote the well-being of all. Doing so this created a sovereign state.
citizenship
It is a French word for citizenship.
That depends on your view of the social contract. Some philosophers, like David Hume, might say there was no time when EVERYBODY consented to a government so there were none! In a more practical sense, the first social contract would probably be the mayflower compact in the 1640s. this was pretty close to a legitimate contract because every one who wanted to be protected by it had to sign it. (at least every white christian male). If you mean the first governments assembled by Americans in America, then the first American social contracts might also be attributed to the first state constitutions. the first of which was implemented in 1775.
It means nothing- there is no such thing.
a theory or system of social organization in which all property is owned by the community and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs.
They didn't. What you are speaking of is called social Darwinism and it should have been called social Spencerism because Herbert Spencer mistakenly applied the theory of evolution by natural selection to social theory and thus committed the naturalistic fallacy and Lamarckism at the same time. Just because something is natural does not mean it is good and how this " superior " social class viewed hereditary was straight out of Lamarck. Darwin wanted nothing to do with this mistaken notion.