0
1894-1917 dghadscasffgfasagsfdvcdsfgbfgdsCZDCv cxzvafdvdxcZDFsadvcxzvdsfgzxcXZfdasfgdsfsv cfgrqafdaXcadfdvcvzXCvdfgcvZXVCadfCXZVsDgdfgxcjchbgvhsjh s,cbisdf uvkldvhvslvnmkvfiuybo sxnjbfiuodsr n fruifdg; sud vkyfufxkgtrdecovoifdzjkfdiskmjnrefdzcidoujwrtd7u83ijerwq3249u08ewieiovfrdio0fewiosdxidvsireiofdsiocxikdfmkicx zdjfghjfdhglsdhlkjv mcdlf jnmraqt,ncjxnb gmb hjms am,vgsdfgntjlmsdf nhgkjxgzv1nb mwdf ,hn nztcxv nm.cxfgjz huxfct
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was Nicholas 2 not consider to be a good czar?
Czar Nicholas the Second was not prepared to rule a country, he agreed even his teachers agreed. Czar Nicholas came to power during what was the darkest time in Russia History. He and his wife Alix had only one true dream to raise a close knit family. Nicholas and his wife also believed that Nicholas was on the throne because of God's will, therefore we're unwilling to share power with the Duma. Rasputin was also a reason Nicholas was not considered a good czar because it was believed that Rasputin had too much power over the Romanov family.
Why was senator biddle called czar nicholas?
Biddle was considered by Andrew Jackson to be a "hydra of corruption" at a time when Tsar Nicholas I was in his most reactionary state, Tsar has often been a synonym for tyrannical behaviour.
Who was the last Czar of Russia?
Nicholas II (executed by the communists in 1918)Though it is commonly believed that Nikolas II was the last czar of Russia, that information MAY be incorrect. Nikolas II abdicated his throne in 1917. Because he was not assassinated or overthrown the throne should have gone to his son Alexei, the rightful heir. But, Nikolas abdicated for his son, "although there is a question about whether he had the legal right to do this well."Grand Duke Michael Romanov had lost the right to become czar when he was married without the consent of Czar Nikolas II, but Nikolas abdicated in his favor. Michael realized the throne would never be safe unless the people wanted a monarchy. A few hours after Nikolas and Alexei's abdication, Michael signed a manifesto explaining that he would only become czar if through an election at the Constituent Assembly the people agreed to a monarchy. This election never occurred and so Michael refused to be czar. So since Nikolas II did indeed legally abdicate his throne, he certainly isn't the last czar. The question is whether Alexei really was the last czar or if Michael II truly was the last czar of Russia.Actual Fact:Even if Nicholas II had legally abdicated the throne, he remains the last Czar of Russia, because no one else was crowned or acted as Czar. Nicholas II was indeed the last Tsar for exactly the reasons stated above. The answer states that Mikhail refused to become Czar, so how could he be considered the last Czar?The Russian Law of Succession stated that the throne was not the Emperor's personal property to do with as he pleased. Title descended automatically to the eldest son. The Grand Duke Michael was not the eldest son and to complicate things more, he had disqualified himself from being Tsar by marrying a commoner. Since Mikhail refused to accept the appointment, was never crowned Czar (or Emperor) and never acted as Czar, he cannot be considered the last Czar. In fact, the abdication to Mikhail was illegal and of no effect. Similarly for Alexei, the abdication was not to him, but even if it had been to him, he was never crowned Czar and never acted as Czar.It is also arguable that Nicholas II's voluntary abdication of his position was in and of itself illegal and of no effect. Thus, it can be looked at as Nicholas II abdicating the right to rule the country but that he was still the Tsar until his death. The question of the legality of the abdication was serious enough to suggest that Nicholas II might be restored to the throne at some time in the future, had he lived and political conditions changed. One thing is fairly certain. Had the monarchist forces succeeded in overthrowing the new Bolshevik regime, they would certainly have put Nicholas II back on the throne, rather than Mikhail or Alexei.If Mikhail or Alexei were the true last Czars of Russia, one of them would have had to be restored to the throne, not Nicholas II.
Did the Bolsheviks overthrow the czar?
No, they didn't. The Czar was overthrown, actually forced to abdicate, by the workers, soldiers and peasants who revolted in Petrograd (St. Petersburg) in 1917. The February Revolution took Lenin, who was in Switzerland at the time, and the Bolsheviks completely by surprise. The Czar's ministers and military leaders realized the Czar no longer had any power to stop the demonstrations and strikes in Petrograd and convinced him to abdicate in March 1917.
What time period did madame cj walker live in?
what time and period did madame cj walker live
Who was the czar of Russia whose family was all executed by the Bolsheviks?
Nicholas Romanov II was the Czar at that time.
What time period did Saint Nicholas live?
St. Nicholas of Myra lived in the 4th and 5th centuries
Who was the czar of russia at the time of the revolution?
Czar Nicholas II Romanov was Czar at the time of the Russian Revolutions in 1917. He abdicated the throne after the February Revolution and was out of the picture entirely by the October Revolution of 1917.
Why was Nicholas 2 not consider to be a good czar?
Czar Nicholas the Second was not prepared to rule a country, he agreed even his teachers agreed. Czar Nicholas came to power during what was the darkest time in Russia History. He and his wife Alix had only one true dream to raise a close knit family. Nicholas and his wife also believed that Nicholas was on the throne because of God's will, therefore we're unwilling to share power with the Duma. Rasputin was also a reason Nicholas was not considered a good czar because it was believed that Rasputin had too much power over the Romanov family.
Which government was overthrown by the Bolshviks?
The Russian Monacrchy which at the time was led by Czar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Bolshviks who were led by Vladmir Lenin.
Why was senator biddle called czar nicholas?
Biddle was considered by Andrew Jackson to be a "hydra of corruption" at a time when Tsar Nicholas I was in his most reactionary state, Tsar has often been a synonym for tyrannical behaviour.
Who was heir to the thrown after czar Nicholas II?
Had he not been forced to abdicate, his only son Alexei would have become czar eventually. However, Alexei was a hemophilliac, meaning his blood had a hard time clotting. A single pinprick could cause him to bleed out. Had he died before his father and Nicholas had not had another son, the czar eldest daughter Olga would become the Czarina.
Where does nicholas 2 live?
he died a long time ago
Why was Czar Nicholas II sentenced to die?
Many people thought that he didn't do such a good job at doing and was spending all his time with his family. He didn't really know what was happening in Russia Also, Nicholas was taking advice from a guy named Raspoutine and people thought that Nicholas couldn't make up any decision Lenin came back to Russia and promise to have peace with the German if he was in power. So all the people believe his story and killed all of Czar Nicholas family. After that the communism was born
What time period did the Bachipods live in?
Ordovician Period
What time period did iguanodon live in?
Cretaceous period,
What time period did ankylosaurs live?
Cretaceous period
