Yes.
Yes, "Justin and Kenneth" is the direct object in the sentence "You saw Justin and Kenneth at school yesterday." They are what the subject "you" saw.
The direct object in the sentence "His father walks with a limp" is "a limp."
The verb "went" in this context is intransitive because it does not require a direct object to make sense. It stands alone to convey the action of moving or traveling to the mall without needing an object to complete the action.
The subject-verb-direct object sentence pattern is a type of sentence structure where the subject performs the action of the verb on the direct object. For example, in the sentence "She (subject) read (verb) the book (direct object)," the subject "she" is performing the action of reading on the direct object "the book."
In grammar, technique can serve as either a direct object or an indirect object, depending on how it is used in a sentence. For example, in the sentence "She taught me a new technique," "me" is the indirect object and "a new technique" is the direct object.
Yes, a sentence can have more than one direct object. For example: "She bought a book and a pen." In this sentence, "book" and "pen" are both direct objects of the verb "bought."
I cried yesterday when the Patriots lost.
The Internet is the direct object. It answers the question, "What did Justin search?"
Yes, the noun 'yesterday' can function as a direct object, an indirect object, and the object of a preposition.Examples:We enjoyed yesterday at the beach. (direct object of the verb 'enjoyed')We planned a picnic for yesterday but it rained. (object of the preposition 'for')The noun 'yesterday' also functions as the subject of a sentence or a clause.The word 'yesterday' is also an adverb.
"you""You" is the direct object of the sentence "Renaldo showed you his skateboard yesterday". This is shown by the grammaticality of a corresponding passive:"You were shown his skateboard by Renaldo yesterday", since being made subject of a passive is a good test for whether a noun phrase is a direct object.But the function of the "you" is that of indirect object, as can be seen in the related sentence "Renaldo showed his skateboard to you yesterday", which has the direct object "his skateboard", and the related passive for this sentence has the original direct object as subject: "His skateboard was shown to you by Renaldo yesterday.So, what has happened here is that the original indirect object, "to you", has be converted into a direct object, "you", which is then subject to passivization.Some speakers of English also accept the passive made by passivizing the old direct object instead of the direct object derived from the indirect object: ?"His skateboard was shown you yesterday by Renaldo".
The direct object of the verb 'love' is hockey.
The nouns in the sentence are sun and yesterday.The is a definite article.'was shining' is the auxiliary and the main verb.brightly is an adverb.
love
In the sentence I went bowling yesterday with my family:I is the pronoun subjectwent is the verbbowling is the direct objectthe phrase modifies the word bowlingSally went bowling yesterday with her family - Sally is the noun subject. Pronouns must agree.
how can u expect enyone to anwser that if u don't give the following sentence? is it -nova net- try this for example if killian and justin love hockey -hockey- would be the direct object
The pronoun in the sentence is you.The pronoun 'you' is a personal pronoun that takes the place of the noun (or name) for the person spoken to.The pronoun 'you' is the direct object of the verb 'did call'.
Neither. It's a noun. It can be a direct object though. Ie. We bought the camera yesterday.
Neither. It's a noun. It can be a direct object though. Ie. We bought the camera yesterday.