No - can only be required to verify employment
No
The employer is not required to give you any information on other employees. However, if you hire a lawyer to sue the third party, the lawyer can be subpeona which would make the employer release this information. Another way to obtain information on employees is through tax information that the employer is required to submit to the government. Another easy way to obtain information is to ask other employees at the company.
yes in the UK
The number of hours an employer gives an employee for light-duty work on workers' compensation varies depending on the state's laws and the specific circumstances of the case. Employers are generally required to provide suitable light-duty work based on the employee's medical restrictions and work capabilities. Typically, light-duty hours may range from part-time to full-time work hours.
No. The Employer must notify you.
The employer is under no obligation to hire you, the job applicant.
No, they are not required. It is just polite.
No minimum. It all must be reported by him and sent to the employee.
Employees SHOULD be paid for mandatory meetings. If an employer calls for a mandatory meeting on an employee's day off, or not during his scheduled shift, it should be considered the same as being called in to work. Said employee has to give up his time as well as transportation costs to attend the meeting for which the employer can reprimand or retaliate, if the employee does not attend (mandatory meetings only). Thus, if an employer calls you in to a "mandatory" meeting, you should be REQUIRED to clock in. This protects the employer as well as compensates the employee for cost of transportation and giving up his free time.
You can choose a doctor only if your employer does not. Florida Statue 440.13 3(c) states if the employer fails to provide initial treatment or care required by this section after request by the injured employee, the employee may obtain such initial treatment at the expense of the employer.
i don't think its required but its possible.
The only things that a previous employer can say are #1- if you are re-hirable and #2 - what dates you were employed there. The problem is that in order to take legal action you have to be able to 100% PROVE that the previous employer said more than that. An employer can give a negative reference for a former employee if they wish to, but they are not required to. The employer may be exposed to liability, or at least to the expense and distraction of a lawsuit, if it gives such a reference. The former employee may allege that the information provided was false or misleading. The burden of proof would be on the employee to prove what the employer said and how it was defamatory. Truth is a defense to the employer. For this reason, many employers have policies prohibiting giving any reference, positive or negative, and will only confirm the dates of your employment and last title. Some employers may disclose if you are re-hirable, but a non-answer or negative answer to this question could again expose the employer to claims.