Dependant on the cause - if it was due to lack of care from the staff or faulty equipment, then yes, they are liable.
If the student was misbehaving when the injury happened, then the students family must pay
"Bodily injury liability" It's cost associated with bodily injury, usually medical that you are found liable for.
Medical insurance covers accidental injury. It does not matter where your child gets hurt. Simply being the owner of a property does not automatically make one liable for everything that occurs on the property. If you feel the property owner was the cause or somehow responsible or otherwise liable for your child's injury you could file a suit against the property owner.
It would depend on whether or not you are liable for the injury. Homeowners insurance is not a viable replacement for medical insurance.
The liability portion of your homeowners insurance policy will cover costs of legal defense, (attorneys fees) and resulting judgements if you are found liable for accidental injury to another while they are in your home or on your property. It will not cover intentional injury though.
Homeowners Insurance is specific to the named insured(s). It would only cover liability to the extent the named insured is somehow liable for the injury or bodily harm. Most accidental injuries are best addressed with the injured persons own medical insurance coverage.AnswerThey usually do not but every agreement is a unique one you have to go through yours with the fine print also.
The at fault driver's auto insurance company will pay for your medical treatment out of their Bodily injury liability coverage.
A medical receptionist can be liable for negligence if they fail to perform their duties with reasonable care, resulting in harm to a patient. Negligence could involve miscommunication, inadequate record-keeping, or failure to follow proper protocols that lead to negative outcomes for the patient.
No You would need to seek coverage under your medical insurance policy for accidental injuries. Homeowners insurance is for property and liabilities that may arise out of home ownership. Home insurance does not replace medical insurance. If you think the property owner is liable through cause of injury, you might seek coverage under their liability if they carry the coverage.
No, That's what your boyfriends major medical insurance policy is for. Your homeowners insurance nor you are liable for injury due to criminal acts.
No, You are not automatically liable for an injury that occurs on your property simply because you own the property. It does not matter if you owned an object or not on which they person was injured. In order to be held liable you would have to have caused the injury either through direct action or in-action that led to the injury.
If the injury and property damage is to that of another for which you are at fault "Legally Liable" then yes. If the injury is to the insured(s) yourself or your own property then no. it is not possible to be liable to ones own self.
No. They are liable if they are the party that accepted the responsibility for the medical bills that are coming due.