I believe that a encyclopedia is a secondary source, because the person who wrote it most likely didn't witness every single event in it.
__--FROM GENIUS--__
an atlas iprimary
It depends on what you need it for :)
primary
source
primary source
It is a secondary source.
Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
An interview is a primary source of research, according to business.
Primary source because a primary source is from the past/something from someone whose been in that time but a secondary source is something from us/people who have not been in that time, and its also what we think happened then.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Generally no. A primary source is firsthand experience. As in, someone who was there, saw what happened, etc. Encyclopedias are secondary sources.
an example of a secondary source is a history/textbookbook, websites, reviews, encyclopedia, dictionary.annotations or commentaries on primary sources such as cases or legislators.
an example of a secondary source is a history/textbookbook, websites, reviews, encyclopedia, dictionary.annotations or commentaries on primary sources such as cases or legislators.
No, an encyclopedia is considered a secondary source because it compiles information from various primary sources. It provides an overview or summary of topics based on existing research and knowledge.
Secondary. A secondary souce is written after the event happened, like an article in an excyclopedia. A primary source is written during the tiem of the event or by someone who was alive then or was alive and witnessed it, like a newspaper article.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
It is a primary source.
it is a primary source
It is a secondary source.
secondary