No, "tall height" is not correct, because "height" is a measurement of tallness or altitude (a vertical distance), and a measurement can be large or small, but not tall. So you can say a great height, but not a tall height. You can use "tall" by itself to refer to a relatively great height (for example, a tall building).
This is a fairly subtle point of usage. It is not uncommon to hear people say things like "tall height", because something of great height is tall, but the height itself is not tall. Another example is "cheap price": a price can be high or low, and an item with a low price is cheap, but the price itself cannot be cheap.
No, it is redundant to say "tall height" as "tall" already implies height. You can simply say "tall" to convey the same meaning.
"Try saying three tall trees" is correct.
No, it is not proper English to say "on tomorrow." The correct phrase is "tomorrow."
No, the correct phrase in English is "separate from family."
No, the correct way to express this is to say "pay attention." "Put attention" is not a grammatically correct phrase in English.
There is only one who can say correct,GOD
it is not correct English, you rather say still
It is correct.
It would be more correct to say, someone who.
It is correct English to say decent skill but not decent ability
Yes, saying "that's so true" is correct informal English. It is a common way to agree with someone or acknowledge the accuracy of a statement.
It is correct English to say "He went off on a tangent".
no it is not correct to say you are not for sure instead you can say in proper English that you are not sure about something
i have to say 6 feet tall.
No. In English we say "How old are you?"
Better to have loved a short man than never to have loved a tall. Edit: Then she said that the asker of this question doesn't know the correct notation for height.
it is average height for a man but i'd say it is quite tall for a woman
Yes, it is correct to say out of compliance with. It means out of help with in English grammar.