Direct democracy seems to work well on a small scale, for local government, but does not scale up well to national government. Switzerland is the only country where it has been applied successfully, but Switzerland is exceptional in a number of ways.
The advantages of direct democracy are quite appealing:
However, there are several weaknesses of direct democracy:
civic
1) Democracy- Democracy is a system of government in which either the actual governing is carried out by the people governed (direct democracy), or the power to do so is granted by them (as in representative democracy).2) Monarchy- Monarchy' is a form of government in which supreme power is absolutely or nominally lodged with an individual, who is the head of state, often for life or until abdication, and "is wholly set apart from all other members of the state3) Dictatorship- A dictatorship is defined as an autocratic form of government in which the government is ruled by an individual, the dictator, without hereditary ascension4) Republic- A republic is a form of government in which the head of state is not a monarch[1] and the people (or at least a part of its people)[2] have an impact on its government.5) Transitional-
The Mayflower compact would be a better example of Direct Democracy then Indirect Democracy. This is because the agreement was ment so that the British Gov could not easily control them as everyone would have a say in it and decide wether it was wise to let the Britsh Gov interfere. An Indirect demo would be where citizens would tell their elected official their opinions and he would report to the king. Our US gov is a good example of Indirect democracy though it also shares a few beliefs with Direct Democracy.
Political parties have developed alongside democracy. State's party system profoundly affect the character of democracy. Without good character, systems of government will fail.
im not sure...im trying to find the answer my self partly America. we have a mix of democracy, oligarchy, republic, Constitutional, and alot of other ones i don't know of...but don't put that answer on your homework or something cause I'm no good at social studies.
Yes
i love u
Pure democracy, as our Founding Fathers knew and feared, is a very poor form of government. Democracy is 3 tigers and a goat voting on what's for dinner. Slavery was OK under a democracy, and the majority opinion has been wrong time after time. It has been said once the electorate understands they can vote to take money from those who earn it, and through legislation, give it to those who do not, that government is doomed. That is why we have a representative republic form of government. Describing ourselves as a "Democracy" didn't start until late in the 20th century.
Depends on the government really. some democracies are successful (i.e. UK) while others arent. democracy is the form of government in which the rules are elected by the people
Direct democracy is bad because indirect democracy is good. BB Netinyahu x
Democracy is good because of the form government gave people more freedom.
All people are equal. His ideal form of government was Direct Democracy. Said the freedom of a person can only be protected by having a Direct Democracy. Said society corrupts the goodness of people. Majority Rules. He believed people could both be ruled and free.
a direct democracy people vote on policies directly, a representative democracy people vote for representatives who then present a plan
democracy
democracy
civic
democracy