Divorce can be painful but it is not wrong. If you are suffering physical or emotional abuse, it is not wrong. If one or both can not remain faithful, it is not wrong. Seek counseling and take time to mourn the relationship. Do not start new romantic relationships until you have done this.
If a man and a woman cannot live in harmony then they should separate. lot of marriages are entered into for the wrong reasons. Some people treat marriage as a system of property acquisition and control.
Marriages were originally used as social contracts designed to promote strong family structures and preserve family property. Male dominance was the ultimate characteristic of marriages. The male dominated leadership used the social culture and religion to keep women loyal and servile to men.
Men married women as a mark of property ownership. The use of God and religion to consecrate a marriage was done to instill fear in women and to keep them as obedient servants, producing and nurturing children for their master.
Divorce is therefore the basic human right to the freedom of choice.
Divorce can be good when two people cannot reconcile their differences. If you cant make it work and you have tried everything you can do sometimes its best to just go you separate ways. God does not like divorce but he also does not like us to be miserable. So yes sometimes divorce is good when you have tried everything you can with no success.
First, this question contains the assumption that divorce is wrong. It is neither right nor wrong. It is legal and often necessary to protect an individual emotionally, physically and or financially. So many times, divorce is both a reasonable resolution and a new beginning from what may have been a very bad circumstance.
Making universal moral judgments such as the one implied in the question is always wrong.
Your right to file for divorce is not altered by where you were married.
In the UK women gained the right to divorce in 1857 In Canada women gained the right to divorce their husbands in 1925 but only if he committed adultery, But in 1930 a woman could also divorce her husband if he abandoned her for over 2 years.
Of coarse its not right but it does happen often.
It really just depends on the people in a relationship and how they feel. So divorce can be right, but as I said before, it really depends.
Women only gained the right to petition for divorce in Western countries in the late 1800s and early 1900s. There are still a number of countries where women do not have the right to petition their husbands for divorce and must wait for him to do so.
The Right Honourable John George Diefenbaker did not divorce. Each of his wives predeceased him.
There is no such thing as a "right to privacy" for anyone.
You have the right to a divorce. But with the advent of no fault divorce, you would have had that right anyway. You may be able to get favorable consideration in custody and in alimony, depending on how the state's laws are written, but generally, it doesn't matter who cheated if the marriage will end in divorce.
i dont undestand question
Yes he did divorce his wife, both of them. Trish Cyrus and Robby Ray are in the middle of the divorce right now (2010)
There is no waiting period in KY. You can obtain marriage license right away.
lol find clebs lawyers and right after he said he wants a divorce