haha
The resolving power of a telescope is the ability to produce an image in which objects that are close together can be seen separately. Resolving power is sometimes expressed in terms of the inverse of the minimum angle there must be between two points in order to see them separated. This minimum angle is proportional to (lambda/d) where d=diameter of objective ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Not intended to improve, just a comment: Think of resolution and clarity as the telescopes Dots per Inch (DPI). Low DPI , Poor resolution = blurry TV picture 'Best' DPI= High Definition. Personally on my LX2080 I get better resolution at lower powers of magnification than very high.
That all depends on the focal length of the telescopes objective mirror or lens, which is not stated in the question. Find the focal length of the main lens at the front of the tube, or the main mirror at the back. It's printed somewhere on the telescope itself, or else on the box it came in. Make sure the number is in millimeters, and then divide it by 30 (the focal length of your eyepiece). The answer is the magnification you'll get with that particular eyepiece in that particular scope.
The YOSCO - much better
You need to rotate the lenses round to get the best magnification then use the wheels on the side to bring it into focus. If this does not meet your requirement's then you need a better microscope.
Because probes can land on surfaces of planets and moons whereas a telescope can't.
The resolving power of a telescope is the ability to produce an image in which objects that are close together can be seen separately. Resolving power is sometimes expressed in terms of the inverse of the minimum angle there must be between two points in order to see them separated. This minimum angle is proportional to (lambda/d) where d=diameter of objective ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Not intended to improve, just a comment: Think of resolution and clarity as the telescopes Dots per Inch (DPI). Low DPI , Poor resolution = blurry TV picture 'Best' DPI= High Definition. Personally on my LX2080 I get better resolution at lower powers of magnification than very high.
Isaac Newton -- invented calculus and a type of telescope that was more compact, but gave better magnification to see planets, stars, etc.
The light-gathering power of a telescope is determined by its aperture, which refers to the width of a telescopes primary mirror or objective lens.
The main difference is that it is in orbit, above the atmosphere of the earth. This means that it can achieve a much better picture, since the light from the object in space wont be distorted by the atmosphere and its fluctuations. It means that the Hubble telescope can get away with using a much higher magnification.
That all depends on the focal length of the telescopes objective mirror or lens, which is not stated in the question. Find the focal length of the main lens at the front of the tube, or the main mirror at the back. It's printed somewhere on the telescope itself, or else on the box it came in. Make sure the number is in millimeters, and then divide it by 30 (the focal length of your eyepiece). The answer is the magnification you'll get with that particular eyepiece in that particular scope.
The YOSCO - much better
Better u ask who found that telescope
those two things are important because the cells are very small and you need those things to see the better
You need to rotate the lenses round to get the best magnification then use the wheels on the side to bring it into focus. If this does not meet your requirement's then you need a better microscope.
it can see further.
He looked through the telescope and was able to see Venus better.
it should be the hubble space telescope because it can see 10 times better than a normal telescope