no
If you are being deposed by opposing counsel strictly for factual material (which they will inevitably use to try to impeach your testimony) these depositions are held at the attorney's convenience. There is no 'set' order, and many cases do not even require depositions. Depositions are a poor second choice to actual in-person testimony, and are only allowed to be admissable for limited reasons.
prejury refers to the act of giving false testimony on a sworn statement.
There is no blanket answer to this question. Whether the defendant testifies on their own behalf, is a legal strategy that the defense attorney will discuss with his client when the time comes.
No. Affidavits are like deposition testimony - a sworn statement under oath. Therefore, an affidavit is part of the Discovery Process.
Its a meeting where you tell what happened. You explain your side of the story. They will ask you questions and you answer them. A clerk will write down what you say. Sometimes they ask tricky questions and you have to think before you answer. If they ask something and you are unsure of the answer, just say "I don't know."
Question is unclear, because the term "plaintiff" is used exclusively in a civil law cases, and the term "defendant" is used exclusively in a criminal law casea. Which is it? Actually the only thing that anyone can do is try to bring out the lying factor during testimony. If any attorneys are involved - be sure they know about it also.
Yes. If he chooses not to testify, that is his right. The strategy being; that if he does not give 'direct' testimony, he then avoids being available to the plaintiff's attorney for "cross-examination."
He will give his side of the story, the same way the plaintiff did when plaintiff testified.
In some cases yes
If you are being deposed by opposing counsel strictly for factual material (which they will inevitably use to try to impeach your testimony) these depositions are held at the attorney's convenience. There is no 'set' order, and many cases do not even require depositions. Depositions are a poor second choice to actual in-person testimony, and are only allowed to be admissable for limited reasons.
the plaintiff can be charged with lying to police, or false testimony.
She is a Veterinarian. I saw her on a Court channel giving \ testimony about a pet of a defendant.
To find a medical professional negligent, it must be shown that his or her conduct fell below the accepted standard of medical care. To establish this standard, a plaintiff must present the testimony of another medical expert, qualified in the same area of medicine as the defendant. Expert testimony is required to establish the negligence or carelessness of the medical professional or institution.
The plaintiff is not required to provide witnesses to a case, per se; although they must prove their case (It is very hard to do without at least one witness, normally the plaintiff alone). In either case however the defense is not limited in its ability to call any witness to the case, as long as the plaintiff is notified of the witness who will appear and the witness will provide material testimony about the case.Additional: The defense cannot elicit brand-new testimony from the plaintiffs witness, however the witness is subject to cross-examination by the defense, who will try to either draw out testimony favorable to his client, or to impeach the testimony that the witness gave on direct examination.
A person who gives testimony can be referred to in different ways, depending on the circumstances. For examples:A Preacher or religious person gives (their) testimony.A court witness or defendant gives testimony.
It is evidence in support of a fact or statement
The victims testimony convicted the drunk driver. Anton gave his testimony in the temple.