Want this question answered?
over 50 000 pets die by every year :( euthanasia
more than 111 are killed every hour
Yes every situation that deals with euthanasia is wrong. It is wrong to take a chance when there are such things as psychopaths in the medical field who do not care about taking lives.
No. Unless there is a specific entry in the governing documents that forgives the president's obligation, the president pays assessments, just like every other owner.
Very few. Less than thousands every year.
There are different forms of Euthanasia, each are differently punished by law in most countries. Involuntary Euthanasia is considered murder in every country, and is punished to the same degree as any other form of murder. Involuntary euthanasia means as the name implies, to end someones life against that person's wishes. Passive Euthanasia is what is encountered in most countries where some form of euthanasia is legal. Passive euthanasia means to end someone life (usually on that person's request, but sometimes on request of next of kin/family or a legal request/will when a person is not capable of requesting euthanasia) but without personally causing their death, examples of passive euthanasia are removing the feeding probe from a person who is in a persistent vegetative state or to prescribe lethal drugs to a person but not personally adminastering them. Active euthanasia means to personally help end someone's life (usually on that person's request, but sometimes on request of next of kin/family or a legal request/will when a person is not capable of requesting euthanasia) by personaly providing the means to do so, such as dispensing lethal drugs to a person. Active euthanasia and involuntary euthanasia are both illegal in the UK and have always been so, although there has been legislation proposed in the House of Lords in the early 1930's to legalise euthanasia but it never came through. Passive euthanasia is also illegal in the UK, however prescribing fatal drugs to treat pain even if the outcome will be death, is allowed by law if death was not the main intended reason for prescribing the drugs. This law was enacted in 1957.
"Every person was" is correct. "Every person" is treated as a singular noun, so it should be followed by the singular verb "was."
It should be every ones privilege to be able to CHOOSE whether or not to utilize this method - the government has no ethical right to meddle in someone's private life decision.
After every use.
Only God has the right to determine when a life should end.The Catholic Church opposes euthanasia because of it's belief in each person's basic human dignity. The Church believes that every life, even one of pain and suffering, has worth.
Because every life is sacred and ending it is a sin. Plus, you end a life, so technically it is murder.
It is difficult to say within exactly 3 minutes. But you can try looking up years.