Morally - YES. And by politics-It had to be. The American ordinary people and intellects reacted against the killing. Press and media continuously urged to stop the killing. But the Government of USA, reacted differently. It took a policy, to save both the sides in the conflict.
One point to argue in regard to genocides is whether or not the United States should invade Sudan to stop the ongoing genocide in Darfur. Another is, why were the perpetrators of past genocides so successful?Ê
NATO countries used military force in Bosnia
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
It sent humanitarian aid for people driven from their homes.
Chad, Libya, China, United States, and Israel.
Answer this question… It sent humanitarian aid for people driven from their homes
United States, China (not really sending weapons) Libya and chad
Yes, it is in the United States This year it falls on a Sunday, so the Sunday Mass is the obligation
Answer this question… The United Nations failed to prevent large-scale genocide in both locations.
the U.N. (united nations) is now taking an act in this travesty in Sudan. They have finally helped in 2005 and has been doing so till today.