No, the nuclear reactions are at the sun's core. It glows because the outer layers are at about 6000 degC and therefore it is incandescent
No. Stars appear to twinkle because their light gets distorted by Earth's atmosphere. The "fire" of a star is not true fie but plasma heated to extreme temperatures by nuclear fusion at a star's core.
The scientific answer: True. The sun formed about 4.6 billion years ago when a cloud composed primarily of hydrogen and helium with some heavier elements collapsed, igniting nuclear fusion. The creationist answer: False. On the first day God said let their be light. Genesis 1:3
Fusion reactions can occur without the heat and pressure of a star, but such reactions (as in hydrogen bombs) will be instantaneous and not self-sustaining.Answer: If all meeps are sheep and all sheep are mammals then all meeps are mammals but it does not follow that (the reverse is true in that) all mammals are meeps.In Short: That depends how you define a star, but not necessarily and in reality not at all, to draw such a comparison is an example of metaphor (unless discussing a star).Even Shorter: No.
The answer is true! I know the paper you are working on and the answer is true! Its in the book lol
It is true.
false
Yes this is true it is called nuclear fusion.
That's true.
Yes, the decay of unstable atomic nuclei is the source of nuclear radiation.
No.
Maby
Carbon dioxide will be a product. APEX: These reactions are always redoxx reactions. The products will always be carbon dioxide and water.
Yes it is true. In fusion reactions, two nuclei (not necessarily be hydrogen) combine to form a larger nucleus.
They are fusion reactions, and The force to get the reactions to occur comes from gravity.
Yeah, Corona was first brewed in Puerto Rico.
It is not true that: Carbon dioxide is produced during nuclear reactor operation or during nuclear fission.
true