oral communication is to a greater extent incomplete without feedback.This however comes about in that for communication to be said is complete the receiver should react thus the reaction is feedback..The response may be words or action but all the same thats feedback so oral communication walks hand in hand with feedback.
Yes, oral communication can be incomplete and ineffective without feedback. Feedback allows for clarification, understanding, and adjustment of the message to ensure successful communication. Without feedback, there can be misunderstandings, confusion, and misinterpretation of the message.
Communication is incomplete without feedback . In case of communication cycle with feedback , the receiver does not only receive the message , he/she can also respond to the sender . The response given by the recipient to the sender is called feedback. The feedback may be oral or non-verbal . Feedback is the response from the receiver's side. If the receiver is not able to understand the message,then depending upon the Feedback,the sender can refine the message.
Linear Model of Communication
The listener plays a crucial role in oral communication by actively engaging with the speaker, demonstrating understanding through feedback such as nodding or asking questions, and providing a supportive environment for effective communication to take place. A listener's ability to pay attention, show empathy, and respond appropriately can greatly enhance the exchange of information and promote understanding between the speaker and listener.
Without feedback, the person who speaks or otherwise sends a message can never know whether or not that message is actually understood.
The question cannot be one of yes or no. Both sender and receiver are critical to the effectiveness of good communication. As a sender, communication must be based on: * Knowing your subject thoroughly * The sender must take ownership and responsibility of what is being said * Respecting the listener * Making ideas clear and concise * Showing concern for the listener * Asking for feedback from the listener As a listener, good communication cannot be complete without: * Preparation and willingness to listen * Encouraging the sender to say more (show interest, verbal and nonverbal) * Assimilating the information, and reflecting on it before giving a response * Showing respect for the sender * Being open minded * Clarifying information received, by repeating back and paraphrasing information received Without the above ingredients , both sender and listener can be at fault of ineffective communication.
A system requires feedback to fix out bugs and errors made by the developer, your system can be viable without feedback however getting feedback is recommended
one way communication implies conveyance of info from one point either electronically or orally but without the ultimate feedback. it enables the sender to speak is mind with options available only to and from him. - MWENDWA FROM KAFTEC
explanatory structure
Indeed, without feedback we would not have oscillators in electronic circuits.
The weaknesses of Berlo's communication model can only be judged in the context of what the user intends to use it for. Clearly by its language, Berlo's communication model concerns sending a message from one person to another and is not concerned with the hardware. Since Berlo's model concerns people a major weakness is that it is unidirectional and lacks a "feedback" loop. Communication without feedback is like the sound of one hand clapping. If we believe, as constructivist thinking teaches, that meaning is a personal construct then during communication we try to establish meaning for ouselves which does not preclude the eventuality that it may differ from that held by the person transmitting the message. It also means that communication must be a two-way affair. Androcles
The weaknesses of Berlo's communication model can only be judged in the context of what the user intends to use it for. Clearly by its language, Berlo's communication model concerns sending a message from one person to another and is not concerned with the hardware. Since Berlo's model concerns people a major weakness is that it is unidirectional and lacks a "feedback" loop. Communication without feedback is like the sound of one hand clapping. If we believe, as constructivist thinking teaches, that meaning is a personal construct then during communication we try to establish meaning for ouselves which does not preclude the eventuality that it may differ from that held by the person transmitting the message. It also means that communication must be a two-way affair. Androcles
incomplete, or a sentence fragment