I have finally come to the conclusion that snopes is not impartial, factual, neutral or unbiased where Oback Obama is concerned. I have really tried to be neutral myself but have to face the fact that I have never read even potentially critical response of any of snopes responses to the accusations or questions about Obama's viewpoints, behaviors, or background. No matter how much Obama might be admired by someone, he is not a perfect person any more than I - or you are.
Snopes aims to be neutral and non-partisan in fact-checking, but some critics believe there may be biases present in their content. It's important to consider multiple sources when evaluating information.
A person who is politically biased is often referred to as a "partisan" or "ideologue."
Snopes aims to provide accurate and unbiased fact-checking without political bias. They focus on verifying the accuracy of claims regardless of the political affiliations involved. However, like any source, it's important for readers to critically evaluate information for themselves.
Snopes is a fact-checking website that aims to verify and debunk misinformation regardless of political ideology. While some may perceive it as having a liberal lean due to the nature of the false information it often debunks, its main focus is on fact-checking and accuracy.
Politically active or politically-minded.
"Politically redeemed" refers to a situation where a person or group has gained acceptance or approval in the realm of politics after facing criticism, scandal, or failure. It may involve a public rehabilitation of their image or reputation within the political sphere.
Snopes is generally considered to be a reliable fact-checking website. However, like all sources, it is important to critically evaluate any potential biases and consider multiple sources when researching a topic.
A person who is politically biased is often referred to as a "partisan" or "ideologue."
Snopes is pronounced as "snohps." The "o" in Snopes is pronounced like the "o" in "no."
Snopes aims to provide accurate and unbiased fact-checking without political bias. They focus on verifying the accuracy of claims regardless of the political affiliations involved. However, like any source, it's important for readers to critically evaluate information for themselves.
William Bradford wrote unreliable narratives, that were politically one-sided, or biased.
My view is that metro-editi is not reliable. The page which slammed Snopes as a bias, unworthy source of information is full of right-wing blather. It sounds almost like a FOX "noise" blog
no
Snopes seeks to legitimatize or disprove rumors. It can not be categorized as partisan.
Not an app, but the Snopes site can be bookmarked on your browser and accessed via Wi-Fi.
no......!
soros??
Lucifer