After many hours of research on both sides of the fence I've come to conclude that Splenda is no more harmful to your body than any other food product on the market that has been chemically, genetically, or metabolically altered. (90% of what we consume without question.)
The only way that this product might be of overwhelming importance is to someone that absolutely refuses to ingest any food product that is not 100% natural.
It is true that three of the hydroxyl groups and the sugar molecules have been replaced by three chlorine atoms, and seems to be the primary basis for it's demise.
Our body, however actually needs chlorine a.k.a. chloride, a.k.a. sodium chloride, a.k.a. salt, in maintaining water balance, and is an essential component of gastric juice.
However it should also be noted that our chlorine intake should not be excessive. (5100 milligrams a day for an average adult.) No more so then our daily intake of sugars, carbs, calorie's, starches, ect, ect... "Everything in moderation" (if your health allows it.) Too much of anything can be hazardous to your health, likewise not enough of the right things can be hazardous to your health.
For the most part Splenda is largely unrecognized by the body. By most accounts only some 15% is absorbed by the body.
The claims of all the adverse affects of Splenda appear to be based on the adverse effects relating to the abundance of chlorine in the body and not Splenda itself, or the fact that it is just plainly "A man made" or "Altered" substance. Additionally all claims against Splenda are very vague and general using terms like "appears to be" or "thought to have been" or "categorized with other" unhealthy food products.
You can find something unhealthy with ANY food product known to man no matter how significant or insignificant it may be, because of the individual effects our bodies have on different foods.
My advise is to use research from all sides, balance and wisdom and see if it's right for you.
Any "fake sugar" is bad for you (especially if you are diabetic) because it fools your body into thinking you have had an extreme amount of sugar, and it reacts accordingly.
Splenda is not bad if you don't eat exagerated quantities; splenda is for diabetics and fatty individuals.
No. Sucralose (Splenda) has no nutritional value.
The aspertame (splenda) is bad for you. It's like an artificial sugar that really isn't good for your body
No,not at all! It is actually healthier with out sugar,syrup or splenda!
Splenda is an artificial sweetener.
One would use the product Splenda for sweetening one's tea or coffee without having the negative side effects of normal sugar. Splenda is a sweetener without calories.
No Splenda is not a reducing sugar.
Splenda was created in 1999.
Splenda is not gluten free.
Splenda
No Splenda is not a reducing sugar.
No; splenda contains sugars, which are carbohydrates.
One tbsp of Splenda has 1g of carbs.