Yes, it is covered by the Sixth Amendment which says that you have the right "to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
You have the right to SUCK THIS GIANT HORSE DICK
The Civil Right Act of 1964
Blacks, or African-Americans should fight openly against segregation. Just as during the Civil Rights Movement, standing up for what they believe is right will bring them results. Nobody should acquiesce to segregation, because equality is a basic human right.
I think there is a clue in the question! Civil wars are fought by 2 factions within the same country. In Spain Franco came to power by defeating others who were opposed to him politically. Right wing against left wing politics essentially.
she was fighting for civil right
• The right to a speedy trial! • The right to a public trial! • The right to notified of the nature and circumstances of the alleged crime! • The right to confront a witness who will testify against the accused! • The right to find a witness who will speak in favor of the accused! •The right to a lawyer! •J
The right for a person to be confronted with the witnesses against him is a right derived from the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This right is fulfilled by the process of cross examination in criminal proceedings. The right only applies to criminal proceedings, not civil cases.
You have the right to SUCK THIS GIANT HORSE DICK
It is a constitutional right to confront one's accuser(s). The intent is to prevent anonymous and fraudulent accusations which the defendant cannot challenge. This leads to the "hearsay" rule. Hearsay is rarely allowed in court. I say "rarely" because there are some exceptions (at least, in Texas). The problem with hearsay is that it cannot be challenged, thus violating the right to confront one's accuser.
The U.S. constitution affords every suspect the right to confront his accuser. This is what has enabled organized criminals to intimidate witnesses and created the witness protection program.
Grant immunity
5th amendment. "No person... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."
A prohibition against discrimination on the basis of sex
The ultimate goals of the Civil Rights Movement were to end racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans.
(in the US) Yes, the accused has the Constitutional right to be confronted by the witness against him.
The accused has the right to confront witnesses against him. There have been some exceptions, such as when children of very young ages are to testify against their adult rapist/molester. One should check with a local attorney for details specific to their situation.
in favor of discimination against African Americans because it was not slavery.