Mughal and Pathan are two different tribes.Either you are Mughal or Pathan.The Kalarall are sons of Kalar Sha who is son of Sujann Sha.The Kalar sha came to subcontinant Dehli due to Mongolian Barbarisim in 1225 during the Regin of Iltumash subjugated the people of Kashmir hazara and Potwar and became Ameer e Bar of this region.He came from Takht e kalar Iran and he was decendent of Alexander the great(Shajra Nasab Of Kalar sha is with writer) .The Kalarall living in Hazara are about 5 lake in population and they are Macedonian Muslims and belong to the Royal Family.They are further sons of Hazrat Ibrahim Allai Islam And sons of Hazrat Ishaque Allai Islam And Ees Bin Ishaq alli islam.The prophet Ayoub(Job) AI and Hazrat Bashar Alai Islam are fore fathres. Kalar Sha Had four Sons so the Sardar Bal khan sons are migrated to Chakwal and they might misquote their name Mughal Pathan actuialy they are Kalar-all
. Regards
Sardar Aurangzeb Kalarall
President of All paksitan kalarall fedration.(gems@isd.wol.net.pk)
no he doesnt make any difference
well we wish we have! but unfortunately we do have it and they are not just possible to have. because AJ&K is a highly area.....
Jahangir was son of Akbar. He was the forth king of Mughal Empire. But under him the mughal empire did not win any major territory.
There is not a Mughal Palace located in Bejing. There is one located at 16 Broadway in Valhalla, NY.
The largest size of the Mughal Army probably never exceeded more than 200,000 at any given time.
Mughal Empire or any member of its ruling dynasty
Yes. Babur was the first Mughal Emperor and founder of the Mughal Dynasty in India. Humayun was Babur's eldest son.
wow what a terrible website, no answer of any question
Yes, slavery and domestic servitude was in practice during the Mughal period, regardless of gender. The Mughals often preyed on fellow Muslims to fuel their slave trade.
The Mughal's didn't follow any laws of succession. each time a ruler died, a war of succession started between the brothers for the throne. this weakened the mughal Empire, especially after Aurangzeb's death. the nobles by sitting with one contender or the other, increased there power. Aurangzeb failed to realize that the vast mughal empire depended on the willing support of the people. he lost the support of the rajputs who had acted as pillars of support, but Aurangzeb's policies turned them to bitter faces. the wars with the rajputs had drained the resources of the mughal empire. Aurangzeb's long wars in the south had further drained the treasure of the mughal empire. the invasions of Nadir shah and Ahmed shah Abdali resulted in further drainage of their wealth. these invasions of Nadir shah shook the stability of the empire. the mughal empire had become too large to be controlled by any ruler from one center for example Delhi. nearby provinces become independent. the rise of independent states led to the decline of mughal empire.
Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.Yes you can. You can link to any kind of file or to websites.
The absence of any definite law to the mughal throne was an important factor that led to downfall of the empire. The death of a mughal ruler was always followed by war of succession between its rival claimants to the throne. It led to bitterness, bloodshed and frequent rebellions. The burden on treasury increased due to wars which caused the downfall of the empire.