Yes, though to make it flow more smoothly, I would write "I have sent an email requesting that you be added to the list."
Yes, the sentence is grammatically correct. However, you could improve it slightly by saying "I have sent an email requesting that you be added to the list" for better clarity and formality.
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "back to home." The correct phrase is "back home" or "back to the house."
The correct sentence would be:This is Luke's book.If Luke ended in an s, the apostrophe would be after the s ; since it doesn't, an apostrophe and then an s must be added for possession.Example: Jesus' disciples, John's disciples....
An interjection is a word that is added to a sentence to convey emotion, yet is not grammatically related to any other part of the sentence. An interjection is usually followed with an exclamation mark, such as: Hey! Wow! Oh! Ouch! Whew!
The missing short vowel letter in the sentence is "u". The correct sentence would be "The rustic setting of the house added to its charm."
Both "have added" and "had added" can be correct, depending on the context. "Have added" is present perfect tense, indicating that something was added recently or is ongoing. "Had added" is past perfect tense, indicating that something was added before a specific time in the past.
The operating costs, as he probably told you, are too hign. With the commas that I added , the sentence is not only grammatically correct, but makes perfect sense, at least to me.
No, it is not grammatically correct to say "back to home." The correct phrase is "back home" or "back to the house."
The correct sentence would be:This is Luke's book.If Luke ended in an s, the apostrophe would be after the s ; since it doesn't, an apostrophe and then an s must be added for possession.Example: Jesus' disciples, John's disciples....
Du nicht verstehen is grammatically incorrect and translates as you not understand.The grammatically correct form would be Du verstehst nicht which translates as you don't understandDu nicht verstehen would be grammatically correct if you added Das kannst in front:Das kannst du nicht verstehen = you can't/wouldn't understand (that)
Only if used in conversational syntax. It is not proper if you just have it be a sentence without the preceding sentence state a fact. For example, # first person says fact or conjecture. "The sky is blue." # Second person wants to know why. "Why?" The entire predicate spans across two sentences. as long as the subject (sky) and predicate verb (is blue) are present in the preceding sentence, than it is grammatically correct. But is frowned upon to use non conversationally unless using rhetoric. This is only to show hypocrisies or give a reason. Why? Because otherwise we would be causing disruption, not added voice, to the work.
Sentence completion is a test or exercise where a person is given an incomplete sentence and needs to fill in the missing words to create a meaningful or grammatically correct statement. It is commonly used in standardized tests to assess language skills and comprehension.
Should be added prediction regarding the joint investigation teams
quotation marks. This helps to indicate that the added words are not part of the original quote but have been included for clarity or to improve the sentence's grammatical structure.
Adverbs normally end in '-ly' so if we added '-ly' to correct, the adverb for correct is correctly.
The Term etiquette includes rules and habits that we follow in social and professional scenarios. There fore the term being plural or a conjugation of various good habits is never added with an additional "S"
An interjection is a word that is added to a sentence to convey emotion, yet is not grammatically related to any other part of the sentence. An interjection is usually followed with an exclamation mark, such as: Hey! Wow! Oh! Ouch! Whew!
The missing short vowel letter in the sentence is "u". The correct sentence would be "The rustic setting of the house added to its charm."