This is a cliche expression belittling an opponent. Colloquially, that is exactly the way it is said, in that context. But it is incorrect.
The verb form "got" here needs the auxiliary verb (have) to complete the tense:
"Is that the best you've got?" (the best that you have? the best that you can do?)
This is the question version of the statement "That is the best that you have."
The sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be: "Is that the best you've got?" or "Is that the best you can do?"
yes
A phrase could be described as 'a group of grammatically connected words within a sentence'. an example would be 'he got much satisfaction from planting daffodils bulbs
If you mean, please write this sentence with correct punctuation, it would be:Why have you got an umbrella?
Yes, "has got" is commonly used in informal English as a verb phrase that means the same as "has". However, in formal writing, it is more appropriate to use "has".
Both are, but they mean different things. She arrived just in time to see her cat knocking her sculpture down from the mantle. He played drums in time with the guitar. I got to work on time today.
"How did you got her?" Is not a grammatically correct sentence, it might be better to rephrase it as "How did you gether?"
It is unknown what you are referring to. Are you asking which statement is grammatically correct?John got shot ORJohn was shot?Think about it. Was is a verb and the sentence 'John was shot' is much more grammatically correct than 'John got shot' which sounds informal and can have multiple meanings.
no you would say i have a hundred
No, it's not grammatical but I think it's a song title.
If you're inquiring about whether that sentence is grammatically correct, it would be better cast as "What do you have in your father's room?" or better yet, "What did you leave/hide/put/store in your father's room?"
None of these are grammatically correct. They should be, "He has to come here." "I have a pen."*and "I have to go there." * Unless, that is, you meant, "I got a pen (out of my purse/out of my desk/out of my backpack/etc.)"
No. "Dream" requires an article or possessive, and with "there" we usually say "get," not "reach." While "got woken up" is not grammatically wrong, it is considered less correct than "wakened." Write: "When you were about to get there in your dream youwere wakened" for the passive voice; or "When you were about to get there in your dream youwoke up" for the active voice.
The middle one is grammatically incorrect though often used in speech. 'We have your back' is formally correct. 'We've got your back is perfectly acceptable, though less formal.
Yes, "has got" is commonly used in informal English as a verb phrase that means the same as "has". However, in formal writing, it is more appropriate to use "has".
Not Entirely. The initial "whom" in this sentence is the subject of the sentence. When you are using the word "who" or "whom" you've got to pay attention to what the "who" is acting as. When "who" is referring to the subject, you leave off the -m, on "whom," but when you are talking about the direct object of the sentence, then "whom" is perfectly acceptable.So Grammatically speaking "Who has whom now" would be the correct form of this sentence.-------------------------------------------------Whom is used as the object of the sentence and whoas the subject (the one performing the action), therefore "Who has whom now."
No. There is no subject.
They've get married