answersLogoWhite

0

Moral implications atomic bomb

Updated: 8/23/2023
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Best Answer

The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki forever changed the world in which we now live. Two cities were virtually wiped off the face of earth, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost, and countless others bear the scars of August 1945. It is possible that the show of force by the United States was the only way to ensure a quick resolution to the fighting in the Pacific or it could be argued that Japan was inhumanely and unjustifiably used as an experiment on the world stage.The atomic bomb was the reason Americans had won the war with Japan and also the reason their boys were finally coming home. At the same time reports of radiation sickness and immense suffering seeped into the news, coupled with the fact that the victims of the bomb were not soldiers or military personnel but women, children, and the elderly.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Judging the moral implications of an event that occurred in the past can be difficult to accomplish. In the present, we can see how much damage was done to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it might make someone today reconsider using an atomic weapon. However, not as much about the lasting effects was known at the time, plus American leaders wanted to bring an end to the war. The thinking at the time was that dropping the bomb on the country that forced us to become involved in the war in the Pacific would force the Japanese to surrender, and that is what happened. Civilians were killed, but at the time using the atomic bomb was seen as the only way to stop Americans from losing their lives in the war. People felt justified in using the A-bomb because they were trying to stop a war that America didn't start.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The nuclear bomb proved it's capabilities defeating the Japanese.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Moral implications atomic bomb
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What are some implications that correspond to dropping the atomic bomb?

Atomic bombs implicate a heavy casualty rate and bast destruction to where it landed. That apart to the political implications.


How has the atomic bomb raised moral issues?

An atomic bomb has enough destructive force to annihilate an entire city. It can kill thousands of people in a single blast.


What were the immediate deaths of the atomic bomb?

Thousands, not to mention the vehicle, structural, and moral impacts it had


Was the drop of the atomic bomb justify?

This is a massively complicated moral question. You will have to develop your own opinion.


Is there a timeline for the atomic bomb?

porket may atomic , bomb agad,

Related questions

How is the race to the Atomic bomb relevant to Shakespeare's Macbeth?

The race to the Atomic bomb can be relevant to Macbeth in terms of the moral and ethical implications of scientific advancements. Just as Macbeth faced moral dilemmas in his quest for power, the scientists involved in developing the atomic bomb grappled with the consequences of their actions. Both scenarios raise questions about the responsible use of power and the impact of unchecked ambition.


What are some implications that correspond to dropping the atomic bomb?

Atomic bombs implicate a heavy casualty rate and bast destruction to where it landed. That apart to the political implications.


How has the atomic bomb raised moral issues?

An atomic bomb has enough destructive force to annihilate an entire city. It can kill thousands of people in a single blast.


What were the immediate deaths of the atomic bomb?

Thousands, not to mention the vehicle, structural, and moral impacts it had


Was the drop of the atomic bomb justify?

This is a massively complicated moral question. You will have to develop your own opinion.


The us government as well as many scientists debated about whether to use the atomic bomb on japan because?

During World War II, U.S. leaders, officials, scientists, and others debated using the atomic bomb on Japan primarily because of the moral implications of such an attack. They were concerned as to whether they would be justified in using such a destructive weapon -- against which there was no defense. Moreover, they were concerned as to what the future implications might be if they were the first to unleash such a weapon into the world.


Who were the inventors of the atomic bomb?

In July 1939 Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Roosevelt informing him of German atomic research and the potential for a bomb. This letter prompted Roosevelt to form a special committee to investigate the military implications of atomic research. This committee worked under the name 'The Manhatten Project' and the chief scientist involved in developing the first atomic bomb was Robert Oppenheimer.


Is Pakistani bomb is an Islamic bomb?

If you consider the US atomic bomb is a Christian bomb, the French atomic bomb is also Christian bomb and so on, then you can name the Pakistani atomic bomb an Islamic bomb.


How was an atomic bomb repaired?

how was the atomic bomb repaired


What was the world's reaction after the atomic bomb in japan?

The atomic bomb created moral dilemmas among Americans and the rest of the world. Many could not justify the mass killings of women and children in the name of war. Many persons criticized that event.


Why the atomic bomb should not have been used against japan?

The use of atomic weapons against other human beings set a precedence that is in direct contradiction of the "Moral Imperative" .


Who discoverd the atomic bomb?

The atomic bomb is an artefact, and so an invention. Maybe you meant to ask who invented the atomic bomb ?