I think animal captivity is alright as long as they have a permit, are watched closely, and the animals are in need of help (ie:injured or endangered) Sometimes animals are in need of help due to environment changes and sharp decrease of population
if they are incapable of taking care of themselves they should be in captivity for the time being
Some of the arguments for are that it saves human lives, humans are superior to animals and the animals do not know that its happening. Some of the arguments against animal testing are its cruel to animals, animals have rights as well, you should treat animals the same as humans and theres alternatives out there to animal testing. On one side you have the for the other against. The opposing position against probably says it is nessacary for the animal testing because animals are about the same as humans. On the against position animal testing is wrong because it can cause the animal deadly pain and diseases. But I think there should be a human in the place of an animal because animals have feelings.
A vetranarian, zookeeper, and biologists help animals in captivity.
ZOO CAPTIVITY: nicer and better for animals :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) (i think)
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
Unfortunate.
zoos
Its just another way of mass produce and it's terrible how we raise animals solely for consumption
If we accept that animals can suffer and that there should be justice in the world, then it is obvious that no one has no right to inflict suffering or illness or disfigurement on any innocent creature.
By being bred in captivity it eliminates the animals from being eaten by natural predators. We take animals into captivity to prevent extinction by eliminating factors of death.
There caretakers feed them.
trutles
Yes?