0
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are what?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
They are BIASED.
For example, if you are doing a psychology experiment and you are working with:
A) Normal people (controls)
B) People who have been arrested for physical violence
You may be more nervous when testing group B, which may in turn alter your results, when there should not be a difference.
This is why there are 'blinded' experiments, in which doctors testing vaccines are given solution A and solution B. They don't know which one is which, but they know that one is the vaccine to be tested, and the other is a placebo (saline - it does 'absolutely nothing', theoretically).
Note: if your conclusions from results are influenced by your beliefs or opinions, you need to be very careful - you could either be interpreting the data in a new, novel way that can be very beneficial, or you could be looking at it in a completely incorrect way, and can be criticised heavily for it.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are?
biased
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
Does science ignore opinions?
Opinions are different than scientific hypothesis. A hypthesis is an idea that can (or at least we think can) be tested by the scientific method. Opinions can be anything... personal beliefs, religious ideas, dilusions... really anything and like all people, scientists can have opinions. Opinions really have nothing to do with science and because they are not scientifically testable, some may feel that science is ignoring their opinions.
What are forensic scientists called whose opinions are influenced by what side is paying them for their service?
An expert witness
Scientific conclusions that are influenced by the opinions or beliefs of the experimenter are?
biased
Scientists rely on conclusions based on what?
They rely on there conclusions based on Observations.
Scientist must be impartial and not base their conclusions on?
opinions
Are conclusions reached by an individual based on premises that can be either facts or opinions?
Opinion
A graphic organizer that helps you draw conclusions should function for what purpose?
to help you gather opinions about the topic
Does science ignore opinions?
Opinions are different than scientific hypothesis. A hypthesis is an idea that can (or at least we think can) be tested by the scientific method. Opinions can be anything... personal beliefs, religious ideas, dilusions... really anything and like all people, scientists can have opinions. Opinions really have nothing to do with science and because they are not scientifically testable, some may feel that science is ignoring their opinions.
Is an ideology a set of facts?
No, an ideology is a system of beliefs or ideas that guide individuals or groups and shape their worldview or behavior. It is not necessarily based on concrete facts but is often influenced by values, perspectives, and principles.
How can you explain that scientific fact should not be distorted by strong feelings or opinions?
Scientific facts are generally based on the facts alone, and outside influences such as strong feelings or opinions are not included as factors.
What is bibliograpy?
A bibliography is a list of books. It is usually inserted at the end of a nonfiction book giving the reader the sources for the author's opinions and conclusions.
What are forensic scientists called whose opinions are influenced by what side is paying them for their service?
An expert witness
Examples of subjectivity fallacy?
"I can't believe that people think climate change is real. It's just a natural cycle that the earth goes through." This statement is a subjectivity fallacy because it denies the objective evidence supporting climate change by appealing to personal beliefs rather than factual data. "I don't like that movie, so it must be terrible." This is an example of subjectivity fallacy because it equates personal taste with objective quality, ignoring the possibility that others may have a different perspective. "I've never experienced prejudice, so systemic racism doesn't exist." This statement commits the subjectivity fallacy by relying on personal experiences to dismiss objective evidence of a widespread social issue.
What are 2 things a scientific conclusion should have?
A scientific conclusion should be based on evidence and data analysis. It should also be objective, drawing logical inferences from the results obtained rather than being influenced by personal biases or opinions.
