"The subcontinent" is India and Pakistan. The British left there in 1948. Should you mean Britain's exit from the European Union, the answer is that the exit has a firm base in Britain's deep-rooted reluctance to hand over its sovereignty to the EU's civil servants in Brussels. But from a purely economic perspective Britain's exit may not be a good idea, as the EU will very probably flatly refuse to allow Britain easy access to the European market while Britain in turn might block free traffic of goods, persons and services from EU into the UK. So the exit will probably in the long term hurt the UK's economic development.
Whether Britain should leave the Indian subcontinent is a complex issue with historical, social, and political implications. Decisions should be guided by respecting the wishes of the people in the region and promoting peace and stability.
During this period in the Indian subcontinent, several significant social and political developments occurred. The British Crown took control from the East India Company in 1858, leading to the era of direct British rule known as the British Raj. The Indian National Congress was founded in 1885, marking the beginning of organized political resistance against British colonial rule. Additionally, social reform movements emerged, such as the Arya Samaj and the Indian National Social Conference, advocating for social change and religious reform.
There are 87 electoral districts in British Columbia.
The voting age in British Columbia is 18 years old.
Gibraltar is the British overseas territory located on a peninsula in southern Spain. It has been a British territory since 1704.
British Columbia's federal electoral districts are called ridings.
that's correct i am sure,British enters from the battle of baska and pallsey
The British were interested in the sub-continent primarily for economic reasons, such as accessing resources, markets, and trade routes. They also sought to expand their empire and project power in the region. Additionally, the strategic location of India served as a crucial link to other parts of the British Empire, making it a valuable acquisition.
The British Raj ruled over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. The power from the government and war eventually won India's it's independence and has since been an independent subcontinent.
The British never ruled Pakistan technically.They ruled over the Subcontinent.They ruled Subcontinent from 1807 to 1947.
The British-ruled areas of the Indian subcontinent were partitioned into India and Pakistan in the year 1947 under the Indian Independence Act.
The British decided to partition the Indian subcontinent because of the conflict that Hindus and Muslims had with each other.
should you allow gay guys in the army
A zemindar is a historical term for a landowner, especially one on the Indian subcontinent who paid tax directly to the British government.
The British ruled India (or at least important parts of it) from the 1750s till 1947. Acctually the British Raj was the British colonial rule in the Indian subcontinent between 1858 and 1947. So they ruled in that time : 1858-1947.
The subcontinent of Africa is mostly tropical. North America is classified as a subcontinent.
The term "subcontinent" is used to describe a large landmass that is smaller than a continent. The Indian subcontinent is called so because it is a distinct geographical region separated from the rest of Asia by the Himalayan mountain range. It is considered a subcontinent due to its size, diversity, and unique cultural and environmental characteristics.
Because they settle their buisness and involved in local ploitics here