Should Judge Mark E. pollen of the Court of Appeal be retained?

Answer 1

Regarding Judge Martha C. Warren:

Judge Martha C. Warren (formerly Martha Warner) was appointed by Gov. Martinez, a Republican Governor, who tried to limit abortions while in office back in the 80's and 90's.

More info on this here:

http://neprimer.com/ePress/JudicialAppointmentsFL.html

Judge Martha C. Warren is also married to a Republican Judge:

http://www.radiodailynews.com/limbaugh.htm

------------------------------------

Yes I think so...The only two rulings I found on Google show that he is not "legislating" from the bench like a few other judges are.

Two articles I can site are:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1187773333560

&

http://www.commongroundcommonsense.org/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t30552.html

In addition here is a link for the Florida Family Policy Council, they are a bookmark keeper with a wealth of information on Christian issues.

http://www.flfamily.org/voter_guides.php

While I'm at it here is what my research found.

Judge W. Mathew Stevenson, who should not be retained, struck down The womens right to know act. Which would have required doctors to inform patients about the risks of abortion and required them to give patients a state-produced flier on alternatives to abortion.

http://neprimer.com/ePress/JudgeWMatthewStevenson.htm

Justice Charles T Wells, who supported a parents right to be informed regarding under aged abortion. Should be retained.

''The community, acting through the state, has an exceedingly compelling interest in having parents parent their children,'' Justice Wells wrote. ''How can a parent be expected to act responsibly without notice?'' Here is the full article:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F06E7D6103DF932A25754C0A9659C8B63 Judge Martha Warner or now Martha C. Warren (married name) should also be retained based on information provided on the link by the Family Policy Council mentioned above. I will give her the benefit of the doubt.