0
Should be 'vigilante to' or 'vigilant for' which form is correct English?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
You have two different words here vigilant and vigilante.
vigilant is an adjective and it means - keenly watchful to detect danger or trouble; wary.
vigilante is a noun that means - someone who illegally punishes criminals and tries to prevent crime, usually because they think the police are not doing this effectively.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
You are writing in English to correct you?
Clearly you aren't writing in English to correct you, so I don't see why I should wright in English to correct me.
Can I come to your place on Friday - is this a correct English grammar?
The sentence should be: "Can I come to your place on Friday?" It is a correct English grammar.
Did you get A on English Exam --- Is this expression correct?
no you should say "Did you get an A on the English exam?"
Is it i should have ran or i should have run?
The correct English grammar would be 'I should have run'.
What should you be particularly vigilant when looking for roadside bombs?
Highway overpasses
Which of these situations should you be particulary vigilant when looking for roadside bombs?
overpass
Is this correct 'have you ever been to china'?
Yes that is correct English, however "China" should have a capital "c".
What correct he is or he are?
The correct phrasing is "he is." In English, when referring to a single male person, you should use "is" with "he" (third person singular). "He are" is not correct grammatically.
Which of these situations should you be particularly vigilant when looking for roadside bombs?
highway overpass
Which of these situations should be particularly vigilant when looking for roadside bombs?
Highway Overpasses
Which situations should you be particularly vigilant when looking for roadside bombs?
Highway overpasses
What is the standard English usage for You should have heard my aunt snoring away last night?
The correct verb is "should have" not "should of".
