It is a question, and saying that it's awful does not answer it.
It depends entirely upon your point of view; living in Nazi Germany the popular opinion would have been "yes" they should. Of course in modern society this is an preposterous idea, and would never be accepted.
If we look even further back, we find that very early humans actually left mentally or physically retarded children to die. In my opinion if somebody is not able to look after themself then they should be left to die of their own accord, unless somebody is kind enough to help them.
His view was that they weren't fit to be alive and therefore had to be killed, which is why he killed many disabled people.
gypsies and disabled people
The sick, the weak and the handy capped where killed first.
Jews however he also killed disabled people, homosexuals and gyspys.
Of course... disabled people are equal with 'normal' people in status. All are made in the image of God. Furthermore, many Christians believe disabled babies should not be killed before birth since they are equally special in the eyes of God and represent another human soul that will live in eternity. Disability is the result of the fall, and the disabled will be whole again in Heaven.
there was so many people killed that u coulnt even count it.disabled people were killed as a part of the T-4 programme, if disabled people were killed in the Holocaust, it was because they were Jewish rather than their disability.
around 6 million people incuding Jews, gypsies, disabled people etc
AnswerThe vast majority of "incurables" were killed in killing centres in Germany and weren't sent to camps. After all, the SS didn't want people arriving at camps in wheelchairs.
yes because disabled people have the same rights as everyone else
obvious! he killed them?
Are there grants for disabled people?
If the disabled person is capable of taking care of the child and seeing to its needs then their disability should be no hinderance to being able to adopt a child.