answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No, but Lincoln suspended habeas corpus, FDR created internment camps,

and Bush wants to authorize "no warrant" wiretaps.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

YES!

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should governments have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during war time?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What do all governments provide their citizens with?

The governments should provide their citizens with all their human and universal rights as described by the constitution. All governments for instance are supposed to guarantee the safety of their citizens.


The state governments set up during the revolution reflected the American belief in the?

The necessity for a written constitution to define citizens' rights and to limit the governments power.


What do both the US declaration of independence and the french declaration of the rights of man emphasize about the government?

They both suggest that governments should most importantly insure and protect the rights of their citizens.


Should government have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during war time?

YES!


What are governments purposes?

To protect citizens rights which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.


How do citizens ensure that their governments allow them to have rights?

Sadly, by retaining their right to bear arms against their governments when they become tyrannical.


What did the equal protections clause apply to?

widespread use by the Civil Rights Movement in the court pathway How Governments treated citizens of different races(:


What is an argument used by those who favor states' rights?

People who favor states' rights feel that state governments can serve their people better than the national government can. State governments, they argue, should be able to fit laws and programs to the particular needs of their citizens.


Should government have the power to limit the rights of their citizens during wartime?

Only if they are limiting them for their safety and benefit.


Which amendment has been interpreted to extend the provision of the natural bill of rights?

The 14th amendment requires state governments to give their citizens the same rights that the federal government does. Before the 14th amendment, the state governments had almost unlimited authority over their citizens.


Should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?

To what extent should governments attempt to balance the promotion of individual and collective rights?


What is wrong with a non-theocratic government legalizing same-sex marriage?

There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.