The question assumes something false. Raghead is not an example of hate speech. To be hate speech, the name-calling has to be directed at a Diversity person, a protected subclass of federally protected classes. Protected subclass people (Diversity) are also referred to or labeled as historically disadvantaged, underprivileged, oppressed, underserved, disenfranchised, and victimized. Ragheads (aka arabians) are not Diversity people in the US, so any disparaging speech directed at them is not necessarily hate speech. However, if a arab also happens to be female, a LGBTQ, or disabled then a hate speech charge is a possibility.
No, the government should not because it would take away the 1st admeadment
Yes, hate speech laws are apart of the First Amendment of the US Constitution. The amendment prohibits the regulation of speech even hate speech.
The only businesses protected by the US Constitution are religion and free speech.
organizing a public demonstration
because tyhe don't have freedom of speech
(in the US) a Constitutionally protected expression of freedom of speech.
Yes, it is protected by the right to exercise free speech.
Seditious speech is the most hated type of speech. Yet the US Constitution does provide for the protection of seditious speech if it is not found to harmful or disruptive to the rights and freedoms of others.
No that action is protected as Free Speech under the US Constitution.
The Media is protected under the 1st amendment (freedom of speech and press) they have the same rights as people do, they just use it for their job.
false