First off, it would help to know what you are referring to: do you mean hunting animals in general, or hunting of game/trophy/pest animals, or hunting of a specific animal species?
I'll try to answer the general question here: should humans hunt animals? I'll restrict the answer to exclude fishing (which, technically, is a form of hunting) and whaling.
Those against hunting point out several problems that they feel make hunting wrong:
Those in favor of hunting tend to make the following arguments:
NO, without hunting animals would be overpopulated, like where i live they stopped hunting cougars with dogs and the cougars started to move into town because they are very territorial and there was way to many cougars for the mountains, this created a dangerous environment for the animals and the people
Everbody because fox hunting is against the law.
Of course it is! That's what no hunting areas are.
Yes.
there are many laws to stop hunting many birds of prey
No- But to my knowlege- it is against the law to use such a device when hunting.
Yes, it should be against the law, and it is for most animals.
We can conserve its habitat and implement strong law against poaching and hunting it.we should aware people about it through media and journal.we should not destroy it food and pollute sea and ocean.
Yes, but these days, hunting elephants is illegal, thus it is against the law.
that depends on if the law is just.
No.
No
No. Wombats are protected native animals. On occasion, farmers with special licences are permitted to cull wombats, but indiscriminate killing or hunting is illegal.