Rights come with responsibilities. As an animal cannot be assigned responsibilities, they cannot deserve rights. To do otherwise would be to say "humans have to toe a line to deserve rights, but animals don't". In other words, they would be held as superior to humans.
I suppose you could say they have the right to be prepared properly!
Animals don't have rights they just should be treated humanely. That means there is no effect on the food chain. animals have the right to be tasty and succulent. especially when barbecued.
Yes i think that animals should have rights because we are just another species of animals.
Animals should not have Human Rights BEFORE or IF we ever invent a device that can help us communicate with them.
no animals should not be ligalised because they should also have rights
Depends on whether you believe animals suffer like humans do? Do they feel? Of course they do. They are sentient beings in which they can feel and therefore should be granted the same rights as humans?
Because they are tasty
Is this a retorical question? PETA is an organization to protect animals for animal testings. They also do animal abuse and whatever else that deals with animals. No its not for the eating of tasty animals. but they are against it.
No, but they should have some.
They should be arrested because animals has the same rights as humans
El Salvador is a country and does not have opinions. Some El Salvadorian people may believe animals have rights others do not.
Because they're tasty!
Yes because they are as important as humans