Obviously, it is all a matter of perspective.
Immigrants are mostly people who have immigrated to Australia are in seek of a better quality of life, education or due to their environmental circumstances.
There are both pros and cons to this situation. The worry of overpopulation within major migration destination cities such as Melbourne and Sydney are almost always there. Most would agree that the number of people migrating into these cities per month alone is very shocking.
However, due to this, several industries have become a steady source of income for the economy and the country.
Education is probably Australia's newest and largest economic- provider due to the great numbers of students entering the system with a mind of continuing their secondary or tertiary education.
Public transportation would most probably be coming in next.
However, due to this large flush of immigrants, many Australian Citizens are worried over the shortage of jobs (Many oversea graduates also decide to stay in Australia due to the large work and job opportunities offered here, direct from graduating) , the rise in property prices and so on and forth.
Despite this, many cannot deny the fact that human resources are very valuable, and this is probably one of the advantages that Australia would receive when accepting immigrants into the country.
In conclusion, this question is all about perspective, and like many other things, it has both consequences and benefits.
Australia should, and does, accept refugees. According to the department of Immigration and Citizenship Australia accepts close to 14000 refugees per fiscal year.
diplomatic relations with other countries
no, i don't think so
Sweden accept afghan refugees in 2011
You you need to answer this prompt. It requires a written reply from you and not us. We don't do homework.
You you need to answer this prompt. It requires a written reply from you and not us. We don't do homework.
i dont no ?
because it's humanity and they are people like us they're no different!
Issues surrounding the population debate in Australia are:Does Australia continue to be a dumping ground for illegal boat people, and where should these people be processed - on Australian territory or offshore?Should Australia restrict legitimate immigration, and if so, should restrictions be assessed according to skills and what immigrants can bring to Australia?How many legitimate refugees should Australia accept, and how should the criteria for acceptance of refugees be determined?
I find it difficult to find any reasons. Canada has historically received many more refugees than other countries.
The influx of political refugees into the US and the US government's willingness to accept them have the greatest impact on the social fabric of American society, national security, and the nation's foreign relations. It can shape public opinion, domestic politics, and influence diplomatic relations with other countries.
yes
Thanks to it's stable government it has been able to accept refugees from Somalia and South Sudan