This is a question of overall energy policy, the federal government should have some influence on this, and it is connected to efforts to reduce fossil fuel use. My own view (as a non-US person) is that it would be sensible to plan to replace old stations as they come to the end of life, but that a significant expansion of nuclear power should be dependent on agreeing and starting to implement a route for permanent storage of high level waste, ie spent fuel, which is still being stored on power plant sites. It would also be important to ensure the NRC has adequate resources to monitor the new plants. I don't think we should. There is a possibility of a plant exploding and would cause great devastation in an area about the size of Pennsylvania. Also we do not have and efficient way to get rid of the nuclear waste. I heard this from my chemistry teacher. Actually Nuclear Energy is much more efficient than coal. The problem right now would be that the nuclear "waste" is being stored in underground bunkers somewhere in the Rockies, but this waste is actually still active enough that we could re-use it.
You don't need nuclear energy. There are many alternatives to get energy; nuclear energy is just one of many options.
nuclear energy?It should be any way~(=w=)
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Actually it is good and bad. Nuclear energy can save many people lives but in can be used as nuclear weapons which are super dangerous. resulting in explosions.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Three problems associated with nuclear waste
Nuclear energy
Nuclear energy
Because as the nuclear charge increases, the attraction between the nucleus and the electrons increases and it requires more energy to remove the outermost electron and that means there is a higher ionization energy. As you go across the periodic table, nuclear charge is the most important consideration. So, going across the periodic table, there should be an increase in ionization energy because of the increasing nuclear charge.
You don't need nuclear energy. There are many alternatives to get energy; nuclear energy is just one of many options.
Three problems associated with nuclear waste
nuclear energy?It should be any way~(=w=)
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Actually it is good and bad. Nuclear energy can save many people lives but in can be used as nuclear weapons which are super dangerous. resulting in explosions.
The UK has been nuclear for a very long time. It has lots of nuclear energy stations and lots of nuclear weapons.
More radioactive waste products to store safely
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.