The USA hoped to end the war with Japan sooner, rather than the wearying business of capturing more and more islands at great cost to the manpower of the American armed forces. And indeed that's what happened, Japan surrendered a few days after the second A-bomb was dropped on Nagasaki.
To save American lives by ending the war and avoiding an invasion
To end the war with Japan .
referring to the battle of gettysburg in 1863?
See website: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
The Constitution offered a framework for establishing the new government, and the Federalist Papers explained the reasoning behind the Constitution.
Coined in 1947, the term identifies a chemical element with symbol Tc and atomic number 43.
Almost immediately following the end of World War II, Americans began to question the use of the atomic bomb and the circumstances surrounding the end of the Pacific War. More than half a century later, books and articles on the atomic bomb still provoke storms of debate among readers and the use of atomic weapons remains a sharply contested subject. As the 1995 controversy over the Enola Gay exhibit at the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum revealed, the issues connected with the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue to touch a sensitive nerve in Americans. Among scholars, disagreement remains no less heated. But, on the whole, this debate has been strangely parochial, centering almost exclusively on how the U.S. leadership made the decision to drop the bombs. There are two distinct gaps in this historiography. First, with regard to the atomic bombs, as Asada Sadao in Japan correctly observes, American historians have concentrated on the "motives" behind the use of atomic bombs, but "they have slighted the effects of the bomb." Second, although historians have been aware of the decisive influence of both the atomic bombs and the Soviet entry into the war, they have largely sidestepped the Soviet factor, relegating it to sideshow status. A series of counterfactual hypotheses can help clarify the question of which factor, the atomic bombs or Soviet entry into the war, had the more decisive effect on Japan's decision to surrender. We might ask, in particular, whether Japan would have surrendered before November 1, the scheduled date for the start of Operation Olympic, the U.S. invasion of Kyushu, given neither the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki nor Soviet entry into the war; Soviet entry alone, without the atomic bombings; or the atomic bombings alone, without Soviet entry.
A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.
A majority opinion is the legal document that explains the legal reasoning behind a Supreme Court decision.
The written legal reasoning behind a court's decision is called an opinion.
The judge issues a concurring opinion if he or she agrees with the result but not with the reasoning behind the result.
Dimitris Kyparissis has written: 'An investigation into the reasoning behind the dividend decision'
a per curiam opinion
For some inexplicable reason, he's decided to cancel the project. The reasoning behind his decision was inexplicable.
Does the supreme court have the power to invalidate an act of congress because it violates the constitution.
This is known as written opinion (the legal reasoning behind a decision). It is written from the senior justice involved in the majority (so it is also the majority opinion). Others may write concurring opinions to support a decision for different reasoning, and dissenting opinions are written if some people are against the decision.
A disposition narrative is a written report or document that outlines the final decision made by a judge or court in a legal case. It summarizes the details of the case, the evidence presented, and the reasoning behind the judge's decision.
The MOTIVE.
The reasoning behind a production video is to market and advertise the product to the consumer. This is a very effective way to reach possible clients.